Komori
Aizawa Securities Group (8708) · RiskReframed

Maintaining the Capital Adequacy Ratio

First written in FY2016. 12 of 23 entries say "Worsened", first in FY2017. Latest entry: FY2022.

23entries
7years
0from disclosures
Share on X
How it moved
ProgressHeldSoftenedWorseMitigatedFY2017-Q1 – FY2017-Q3WorsenedFY2017 – FY2018-Q3MitigatedFY2019-Q1 – FY2020-Q1WorsenedFY2020-Q2 – FY2021-Q2WorsenedFY2021 – FY2022-Q22016: 320162017: 420172018: 320182019: 420192020: 420202021: 420212022: 12022
Same theme, other companies
Risk of constraints on financial business due to a decline in the net capital ratioA theme 22 companies write about · 21 as a headwind · 0 as a tailwind

Aizawa Securities Group moved to the "Worse" side of this theme in 2020, 3 years before the typical company in this theme (2023).

The whole theme swung hardest in 2025: 4 of 14 companies on the "Worse" side.

2 other companies' latest entry also says "Reframed".

Ridges = years it wrote progress, valleys = years it wrote worse. Most hopeful companies at the back. Drag to turn, scroll to zoom, right-drag to pan. On a phone, two fingers turn and pinch to zoom; one finger scrolls the page.
Showing 14 of the 22 companies compared. The sentences above are computed from all 22.
Full recordFilings, disclosures and news, newest first
  1. FY2022ReframedAnnual report

    「Following the company split effective 1 October 2021, the net capital ratio is presented as "—" from the current fiscal year onward.」

    Following the transition to a holding company structure, the filing company's net capital ratio is no longer applicable. The reporting framework has changed from managing the ratio on the filing-company basis to managing it on a group-company basis following the business succession.
  2. FY2022-Q2WorsenedAnnual report

    「Net capital ratio (D)/(E) × 100 429.7% 346.2%」

    The net capital ratio declined from 429.7% in the same period of the previous year to 346.2%, further narrowing the numerical buffer above the statutory minimum of 120%.
  3. FY2022-Q1WorsenedAnnual report

    「Net capital ratio (D)/(E) × 100 452.5% 400.5%」

    The net capital ratio declined from 452.5% in the same period of the previous year to 400.5%, further narrowing the numerical buffer.
  4. FY2021WorsenedAnnual report

    「Net capital ratio (%) 658.0 494.4 470.3 504.0 409.8」

    The net capital ratio declined from 472.1% in the previous period to 409.8%. Although it remains above the statutory minimum of 120%, the numerical buffer has narrowed.
  5. FY2021-Q3MitigatedAnnual report

    「Net capital ratio (D)/(E) × 100 481.2% 468.8%」

    The net capital ratio rose from 429.7% at the end of the previous quarter to 468.8%. The numerical buffer above the statutory minimum of 120% has widened.
  6. FY2021-Q2WorsenedAnnual report

    「Net capital ratio (D)/(E) × 100 494.5% 429.7%」

    The net capital ratio declined from 494.5% in the same quarter of the previous year to 429.7%. Although it remains above the statutory minimum of 120%, the numerical buffer has narrowed further.
  7. FY2021-Q1WorsenedAnnual report

    「Net capital ratio (D)/(E) × 100 501.2% 452.5%」

    The net capital ratio declined from 501.2% in the same period of the previous year to 452.5%. Although it remains above the statutory minimum of 120%, the numerical buffer has narrowed.
  8. FY2020WorsenedAnnual report

    「Net capital ratio (%) 658.0 494.4 470.3 504.0 472.1」

    The net capital ratio declined from 504.0% in the previous period to 472.1%. Although it remains above the statutory minimum of 120%, the numerical buffer has narrowed from the previous year.
  9. FY2020-Q3WorsenedAnnual report

    「Net capital ratio (D)/(E) × 100 514.9% 480.7%」

    The net capital ratio declined from 514.9% in the same period of the previous year to 480.7%. Although it remains above the statutory minimum of 120%, the numerical buffer has narrowed year on year.
  10. FY2020-Q2WorsenedAnnual report

    「Capital adequacy ratio   (D)/(E) × 100 502.0% 494.5%」

    The net capital ratio declined from 502.0% in the same quarter of the previous year to 494.5%. Although it remains above the statutory minimum of 120%, the numerical buffer has narrowed year on year.
  11. FY2020-Q1MitigatedAnnual report

    「Capital adequacy ratio   (D)/(E) × 100 478.8% 501.2%」

    The capital adequacy ratio rose from 478.8% in the same period of the previous year to 501.2%, remaining substantially above the statutory minimum of 120%.
  12. FY2019MitigatedAnnual report

    「Capital adequacy ratio (%) 582.2 658.0 494.4 470.3 504.0」

    The capital adequacy ratio rose from 470.3% in the previous fiscal year to 504.0%, substantially increasing the numerical headroom above the statutory minimum of 120%.
  13. FY2019-Q3MitigatedAnnual report

    「Capital adequacy ratio   (D)/(E) × 100 494.1% 514.9%」

    The capital adequacy ratio rose from 494.1% in the same period of the previous year to 514.9%, increasing the numerical headroom above the statutory minimum of 120%.
  14. FY2019-Q2MitigatedAnnual report

    「Capital adequacy ratio   (D)/(E) × 100 488.7% 502.0%」

    The capital adequacy ratio rose from 488.7% in the same period of the previous year to 502.0%, increasing the numerical headroom above the statutory minimum of 120%.
  15. FY2019-Q1MitigatedAnnual report

    「Capital adequacy ratio   (D)/(E) × 100 476.0% 478.8%」

    The capital adequacy ratio rose from 476.0% in the same period of the previous year to 478.8%, slightly increasing the numerical headroom above the statutory minimum of 120%.
  16. FY2018-Q3WorsenedAnnual report

    「Capital adequacy ratio   (D)/(E) × 100 660.7% 494.1%」

    The capital adequacy ratio fell from 660.7% in the same period of the previous year to 494.1%. Although it remained above the statutory minimum of 120%, the numerical headroom narrowed year on year.
  17. FY2018-Q2WorsenedAnnual report

    「Capital adequacy ratio   (D)/(E) × 100 700.2% 488.7%」

    The capital adequacy ratio fell from 700.2% in the same period of the previous year to 488.7%, narrowing the numerical headroom.
  18. FY2018-Q1WorsenedAnnual report

    「Capital adequacy ratio   (D)/(E) × 100 743.5% 476.0%」

    The capital adequacy ratio fell from 743.5% in the same period of the previous year to 476.0% at the end of the first quarter.
  19. FY2017WorsenedAnnual report

    「The capital adequacy ratio was 494.4%. Under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments Business, financial instruments business operators are required to maintain a capital adequacy ratio of at least 120%.」

    The capital adequacy ratio fell from 658.0% in the previous fiscal year to 494.4%. Although it remained above the statutory minimum of 120%, the numerical headroom narrowed.
  20. FY2017-Q3MitigatedAnnual report

    「Capital adequacy ratio   (D)/(E) × 100 582.1% 660.7%」

    The capital adequacy ratio rose from 582.1% in the same period of the previous year to 660.7%, increasing the numerical headroom above the statutory minimum.
  21. FY2017-Q2MitigatedAnnual report

    「Capital adequacy ratio   (D)/(E) × 100 600.8% 700.2%」

    The capital adequacy ratio rose from 600.8% in the same period of the previous year to 700.2%, increasing the numerical headroom above the statutory minimum.
  22. FY2017-Q1MitigatedAnnual report

    「Capital adequacy ratio   (D)/(E) × 100 580.4% 743.5%」

    The capital adequacy ratio rose from 580.4% in the same period of the previous year to 743.5%, increasing the numerical headroom above the regulatory ratio requirement.
  23. FY2016First statedAnnual report

    「Under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments Business, financial instruments business operators are required to maintain a capital adequacy ratio of at least 120%.」

    It indicates that the statutory minimum level is 120% or higher and that falling below this level could result in suspension of operations or cancellation of registration.
Moved together

"Decline in Fees Received Due to Market Contraction" moved the same way as this thread, in the same document, in 6 of its 23 moves.

654333★123456
  1. ★This thread
  2. 1Decline in Fees Received Due to Market Contraction6×
  3. 2Collaboration with Regional Financial Institutions5×
  4. 3Stable, High-Level Profit Returns4×
  5. 4Expansion of Markets Available for Foreign and Asian Stocks3×
  6. 5Restructuring the Store Network and Reallocating Sales Resources3×
  7. 6Customer-Oriented Community-Based Sales3×

★ is this thread; numbers match the list above. The number on a line is how many documents both moved the same way in; lines between the other threads count the documents they moved together in too. Threads that move together often sit closer.

When this could move next
Aizawa Securities Group's next results are scheduled for 2026-10-29. Read the earnings preview
News
No news is linked to this thread yet. When an article touches it, it will appear here by date.