Risk of a Decline in the Capital Adequacy Ratio
First written in FY2016. 18 of 36 entries say "Mitigated", first in FY2017-Q1. Latest entry: FY2026.
Toyo Securities moved to the "Worse" side of this theme in 2025, 2 years after the typical company in this theme (2023).
The whole theme swung hardest in 2025: 4 of 14 companies on the "Worse" side.
3 other companies' latest entry also says "Worsened".
- FY2026WorsenedAnnual report
「The Company's solvency margin ratio was 388.6% as of the end of March 2026. We believe it is unlikely to fall below 120%.」
The solvency margin ratio declined to 388.6% from 394.7% at the end of the previous fiscal year. However, the explanation that it remains well above the regulatory threshold of 120% continues to be provided. - 2026-04-28WorsenedRevisions to the earnings forecast
「Capital adequacy ratio (D)/(E) × 100 (%) 394.7 388.6」
The capital adequacy ratio declined from 394.7% at the end of the previous fiscal year to 388.6% at the end of the current fiscal year. - FY2026-H1WorsenedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) (D)/(E)×100 639.3 418.4」
The solvency margin ratio declined to 418.4% from 639.3% in the interim period of the previous fiscal year. Meanwhile, it rose from 394.7% at the end of the previous fiscal year and remains above the regulatory thresholds of 120% and 100%. - FY2025WorsenedAnnual report
「The Company's solvency margin ratio was 394.7% as of the end of March 2025. We believe it is unlikely to fall below 120%.」
The solvency margin ratio fell sharply to 394.7% from 614.0% at the end of the previous fiscal year. However, the explanation that it remains well above the regulatory threshold of 120% continues to be provided. - FY2025-H1MitigatedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 635.8 634.2」
The solvency margin ratio was 634.2%, compared with 635.8% in the interim period of the previous fiscal year, remaining well above the regulatory thresholds of 120% and 100%. - FY2024WorsenedAnnual report
「The Company's solvency margin ratio was 614.0% as of the end of March 2024, and it has not fallen below 500% at any month-end during the past 5 years. We believe it is unlikely to fall below 120%.」
The solvency margin ratio declined to 614.0% from 624.7% at the end of the previous fiscal year. Meanwhile, the explanation that it remains well above 500% and the regulatory threshold of 120% continues to be provided. - FY2024-Q3MitigatedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 571.4 631.1」
The solvency margin ratio rose to 631.1% from 571.4% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year and remains well above the regulatory thresholds of 120% and 100%. - FY2024-Q2MitigatedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 571.5 635.8」
The solvency margin ratio rose to 635.8% from 571.5% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year and remains well above the regulatory thresholds of 120% and 100%. - FY2024-Q1MitigatedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 576.1 631.6」
The solvency margin ratio rose to 631.6% from 576.1% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year and remains well above the regulatory thresholds of 120% and 100%. - FY2023-Q2WorsenedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 610.5 571.5」
The solvency margin ratio declined to 571.5% from 610.5% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year. However, it remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2023-Q1WorsenedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 600.1 576.1」
The solvency margin ratio declined to 576.1% from 600.1% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year. However, it remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2022WorsenedAnnual report
「The Company's solvency margin ratio was 571.6% as of the end of March 2022, and it has not fallen below 500% at any month-end during the past 5 years. We believe it is unlikely to fall below 120%.」
The solvency margin ratio declined to 571.6% from 605.1% at the end of the previous fiscal year. However, it remains well above 500% and the regulatory threshold of 120%. - FY2022-Q3MitigatedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 563.6 613.1」
The solvency margin ratio rose to 613.1% from 563.6% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year and remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2022-Q2MitigatedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 587.4 610.5」
The solvency margin ratio rose to 610.5% from 587.4% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year and remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2022-Q1MitigatedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 573.9 600.1」
The solvency margin ratio rose to 600.1% from 573.9% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year and remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2021MitigatedAnnual report
「The Company's solvency margin ratio was 605.1% as of the end of March 2021, and it has not fallen below 500% at any month-end during the past 5 years. We believe it is unlikely to fall below 120%.」
The solvency margin ratio rose to 605.1% from 597.4% at the end of the previous fiscal year, and the explanation that it had not fallen below 500% during the past 5 years continues to be provided. - FY2021-Q3WorsenedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 569.7 563.6」
The solvency margin ratio declined to 563.6% from 569.7% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year. However, it remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2021-Q2MitigatedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) D/(E)×100 584.7 587.4」
The solvency margin ratio rose to 587.4% from 584.7% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year and remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2021-Q1WorsenedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 603.4 573.9」
The solvency margin ratio declined to 573.9% from 603.4% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year. However, it remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2020MitigatedAnnual report
「The Company's solvency margin ratio was 597.4% as of the end of March 2020, and it has not fallen below 500% at any month-end during the past 5 years. We believe it is unlikely to fall below 120%.」
The solvency margin ratio rose to 597.4% from 582.8% at the end of the previous fiscal year, and an explanation was added that it had not fallen below 500% during the past 5 years. - FY2020-Q3WorsenedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 587.8 569.7」
The solvency margin ratio declined to 569.7% from 587.8% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year. However, it remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2020-Q2WorsenedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 584.7」
The solvency margin ratio declined to 584.7% from 635.3% in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year. It remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2020-Q1MitigatedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 632.0 603.4」
The solvency margin ratio was 603.4%, up from 582.8% at the end of the previous fiscal year. It remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2019WorsenedAnnual report
「The Company's solvency margin ratio was 582.8% as of the end of March 2019. When the solvency margin ratio falls below 120%,」
The solvency margin ratio declined to 582.8% from 633.2% at the end of the previous fiscal year. However, it remains well above the regulatory thresholds of 120% and 100%. - FY2019-Q3WorsenedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 587.8」
The solvency margin ratio was 587.8%, down from 635.3% at the end of the previous quarter. However, it remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2019-Q2MitigatedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 635.3」
The solvency margin ratio was 635.3%, compared with 633.2% at the end of the previous fiscal year and 638.2% in the second quarter of the previous fiscal year, remaining well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2019-Q1WorsenedAnnual report
「Solvency margin ratio (%) 632.0」
The solvency margin ratio declined to 632.0% from 633.2% at the end of the previous fiscal year. However, it remains well above the regulatory threshold. - FY2018MitigatedAnnual report
「The Company's capital adequacy ratio was 633.2% as of 31 March 2018. If the ratio falls below 120%, the Prime Minister may order a financial instruments business operator to change the method by which it conducts its business. If it falls below 100%, the Prime Minister may order the suspension of business for a period of no more than 3 months,」
The capital adequacy ratio was 633.2%, above the 631.5% at the end of the previous consolidated fiscal year and well above the regulatory thresholds of 120% and 100%. - FY2018-Q3MitigatedAnnual report
「Capital adequacy ratio (%) 648.3」
The capital adequacy ratio increased from 638.2% at the end of the previous quarter to 648.3%, remaining well above the regulatory thresholds. - FY2018-Q2MitigatedAnnual report
「Capital adequacy ratio (%) 638.2」
The capital adequacy ratio was 638.2%, up from 629.3% at the end of the previous quarter. It remained well above the regulatory thresholds. - FY2018-Q1WorsenedAnnual report
「Capital adequacy ratio (%) 629.3」
The capital adequacy ratio was 629.3%, down from 631.5% at the end of the previous consolidated fiscal year. However, it remained well above the regulatory thresholds. - FY2017MitigatedAnnual report
「The Company's capital adequacy ratio was 631.5% as of 31 March 2017. If the ratio falls below 120%,」
The capital adequacy ratio was 631.5%, above both the 593.6% at the end of the previous consolidated fiscal year and the 618.8% at the end of the third quarter. - FY2017-Q3MitigatedAnnual report
「Capital adequacy ratio (%) 618.8」
The capital adequacy ratio increased from 610.9% at the end of the previous quarter to 618.8%, improving from the immediately preceding quarter. - FY2017-Q2WorsenedAnnual report
「Capital adequacy ratio (%) 610.9」
The capital adequacy ratio declined from 627.0% at the end of the previous quarter to 610.9%. However, it remained above the 593.6% recorded at the end of the previous consolidated fiscal year. - FY2017-Q1MitigatedAnnual report
「Capital adequacy ratio (%) 627.0」
The capital adequacy ratio at the end of the quarter was 627.0%, up from 593.6% at the end of the previous consolidated fiscal year. - FY2016First statedAnnual report
「The Company's capital adequacy ratio was 593.6% as of 31 March 2016. If the ratio falls below 120%, the Prime Minister may order a financial instruments business operator to change the method by which it conducts its business. If it falls below 100%, the Prime Minister may order the suspension of business for a period of no more than 3 months. In addition, if the ratio remains below 100% 3 months after a business suspension order and there is no prospect of recovery, the registration of the financial instruments business operator may be revoked.」
The period-end ratio was 593.6%, with regulatory thresholds of 120% and 100% specified.