Improving the Objectivity and Transparency of Compensation Decisions Through the Nomination and Compensation Committee
First written in FY2021. 2 of 4 entries say "Advanced", first in FY2023. Latest entry: FY2026.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2022: 13 of 92 companies on the "Worse" side.
65 other companies' latest entry also says "Advanced".
- FY2026AdvancedAnnual report
「During the fiscal year, the company held its voluntary Nomination and Compensation Committee 6 times. Attendance by each committee member was as follows.」
The Nomination and Compensation Committee increased the number of meetings from 4 to 6 and disclosed its activities relating to compensation rules, evaluations, candidate selection and other matters. - 2026-05-22RestatedGeneral Meetings of Shareholders
「We have determined that this proposal is appropriate because it was decided by the Board of Directors after deliberation and a report by the voluntary Nomination and Compensation Committee, and because its content is reasonable and consistent with the policy for determining the details of individual director compensation and other payments established in advance by the Board of Directors and with internal rules.」
The practice of involving the Nomination and Compensation Committee in deliberations and recommendations concerning revisions to director compensation was reconfirmed. - FY2023AdvancedAnnual report
「During the fiscal year, the company held its voluntary Nomination and Compensation Committee 4 times. Attendance by each committee member was as follows.」
The Nomination and Compensation Committee met 4 times during the fiscal year, and the company disclosed its activities relating to director compensation, candidate selection and other matters. - FY2021First statedAnnual report
「To enhance the objectivity and transparency of decisions regarding directors' compensation, the company has established a voluntary Nomination and Compensation Committee chaired by an outside director and comprising 3 inside directors and 2 outside directors.」
The company established a Nomination and Compensation Committee chaired by an outside director and comprising 3 inside directors and 2 outside directors, thereby enhancing the objectivity and transparency of compensation decisions.