Risk of Delayed Response to Environmental Regulation and Climate Change
First written in FY2024. 1 of 3 entries say "Mitigated", first in FY2025. Latest entry: FY2026.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2024: 2 of 10 companies on the "Worse" side.
3 other companies' latest entry also says "Advanced".
- FY2026AdvancedAnnual report
「Assuming the risks and opportunities associated with future climate change, we analyzed the impact on business activities using two scenarios: 1.5°C/below 2°C and 4°C.」
Specifying the Company’s support for the TCFD recommendations, analysis of risks and opportunities in 2030 and 2050 under 1.5°C, below 2°C and 4°C scenarios, and monitoring by the Sustainability Committee. The targets for reducing Scope 1 and 2 CO2 emissions compared with fiscal 2018 are 10% in fiscal 2026, 30% in fiscal 2030 and 100% in fiscal 2050. - FY2025MitigatedAnnual report
「To help curb global warming, we have set the following targets for reducing CO2 emissions associated with our business activities.」
In response to the risk of delays in responding to environmental regulations and climate change, targets are in place to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 10% in fiscal 2026, 30% in fiscal 2030 and 100% in fiscal 2050, compared with fiscal 2018. - FY2024First statedAnnual report
「Violations of environmental laws or non-compliance with environmental regulations would result in a loss of trust among business partners, local communities and society at large. In addition, if responses to climate change, such as decarbonizing products and reducing the environmental impact of production activities, do not progress, orders and revenue could deteriorate because of declining competitiveness, and evaluations by stakeholders as a whole could fall.」
Separately identifying non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations and delays in decarbonizing products and production activities as risks affecting trust, competitiveness, orders and revenue.