Worth reading
59In focus
Scored from 5 of 6 sectionsDirection
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
—
Displayed only when the document provides numerical figures.Wording
Conditional
How definitive the wording is.Decision and Details
On-site inspection by the Japan Fair Trade Commission
Implementation令和5年6月16日（立入検査を受けた事実の開示日。検査実施日はNot disclosed）
Going forward公正取引委員会の調査に対し全面的に協力する。
Reason
石油ガス容器用バルブの販売に関し、独占禁止法違反（不当な取引制限の禁止）の疑いがあるとして、公正取引委員会の立入検査を受けたため。
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Matter Covered | On-site inspection by the Japan Fair Trade Commission |
| Implementation Date | 令和5年6月16日（立入検査を受けた事実の開示日。検査実施日はNot disclosed） |
| Reason | 石油ガス容器用バルブの販売に関し、独占禁止法違反（不当な取引制限の禁止）の疑いがあるとして、公正取引委員会の立入検査を受けたため。 |
| Governing Rule | 独占禁止法違反（不当な取引制限の禁止） |
| Future plans | 公正取引委員会の調査に対し全面的に協力する。 |
Items this document does not state (7)
Decision-Making BodyDecision DatePeriod CoveredAmountQuantity / scaleImpact on Business PerformanceRelated previous disclosures
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.石油ガス容器用バルブの販売に関し、独占禁止法違反（不当な取引制限の禁止）の疑いがあるとして、公正取引委員会の立入検査を受けたため。
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.