Profit Decline from Personnel Hiring and Investment in BeeX and mitoco
First written in FY2017-Q1. 5 of 31 entries say "Mitigated", first in FY2026-H1. Latest entry: 2026-10-15.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2026: 19 of 79 companies on the "Worse" side.
1 other company's latest entry also says "Mitigated".
- 2026-10-15MitigatedEarnings
「In the product business during the interim consolidated accounting period, subscription revenue from all of the company’s products, including mitoco, increased year on year, while implementation revenue associated with ERP product sales was also generated. As a result, revenue was ¥1,312.647 million, up 23.4% year on year. Segment profit (operating profit) was ¥86.462 million, partly reflecting the effects of dissolving the U.S. entity in the previous fiscal year and reducing outsourcing costs, compared with a segment loss (operating loss) of ¥80.934 million in the same period of the previous year.」
製品事業は前年同期の営業損失から営業利益へ転じ、投資・費用負担に関する従来の収益面の弱さが緩和した。 - FY2027-H1MitigatedAnnual report
「Segment profit (operating profit) was ¥86.462 million, partly reflecting the effects of dissolving the U.S. entity in the previous fiscal year and reducing outsourcing costs, compared with a segment loss (operating loss) of ¥80.934 million in the same period of the previous year.」
In the product business, profit improved from an operating loss of ¥80.934 million in the same period of the previous year to operating profit of ¥86.462 million, owing to the dissolution of the U.S. entity in the previous fiscal year, lower outsourcing costs and other factors. - FY2026WorsenedAnnual report
「Segment loss (operating loss) was ¥126.279 million, compared with a segment loss (operating loss) of ¥68.714 million in the same period of the previous year, due to continued active investment in mitoco ERP and other products.」
Although active investment in mitoco ERP and other products continued, the product business operating loss increased from the same period of the previous year. - FY2026-H1MitigatedAnnual report
「Segment loss (operating loss) was ¥80.934 million, compared with a segment loss (operating loss) of ¥96.029 million in the same period of the previous year, due to active investment in mitoco ERP and other products.」
Although active investment in mitoco ERP and other products continued, the product business operating loss for the interim period narrowed from ¥96.029 million in the same period of the previous year to ¥80.934 million. - FY2025Product investment and loss position updatedAnnual report
「Segment loss (operating loss) was ¥68.714 million, compared with a segment loss (operating loss) of ¥190.010 million in the same period of the previous year, due to continued active investment in mitoco ERP and other products.」
Although active investment in mitoco ERP and other products continued, the product business operating loss narrowed from ¥190.010 million to ¥68.714 million. - FY2025-H1Mid-year investment and loss position updatedAnnual report
「Segment loss (operating loss) was ¥96.029 million, compared with a segment loss (operating loss) of ¥47.904 million in the same period of the previous year, due to continued active investment in mitoco ERP and other products.」
Active investment in mitoco ERP and other products continued to drive the product business operating loss, which was updated from ¥47.904 million in the same period of the previous year to ¥96.029 million. - FY2025-Q1Profit position updated following investment in mitoco ERPAnnual report
「Segment loss (operating loss) was ¥85.909 million, compared with a segment loss (operating loss) of ¥48.587 million in the same period of the previous year, due to active investment in mitoco ERP and other products.」
In addition to the existing investment in developing new mitoco functions and other areas, the company cites active investment in mitoco ERP and other products as a factor behind the product business operating loss. - FY2024Additional product investment, advertising and business transition costsAnnual report
「The company actively invested in mitoco ERP and other products, increased hiring of marketing personnel for the product business, participated in major events, and produced and placed video advertisements for mitoco inside taxis. It also incurred costs during the period to terminate its joint business for DataSpider Cloud with 株式会社セゾンテクノロジー（旧株式会社セゾン情報システムズ） and release the service as its own product, mitoco X.」
In addition to the existing investment in mitoco development and hiring, the company cites investment in mitoco ERP, major events, in-taxi video advertising, and the transition costs from DataSpider Cloud to mitoco X as factors weighing on profit. - FY2024-Q3Additional event and advertising costsAnnual report
「Segment loss (operating loss) was ¥147.388 million, compared with a segment loss (operating loss) of ¥99.531 million in the same period of the previous year, due to higher costs from continued active investment in developing new mitoco functions, participation in major events, and the production and placement of video advertisements for mitoco inside taxis, among other factors.」
In addition to the existing investment in developing new mitoco functions, the company cites participation in major events and the production and placement of in-taxi video advertisements as factors behind the product business loss. - FY2024-Q2Profit position updated following graduate hiring and subsidiary investmentAnnual report
「Segment profit (operating profit) was ¥993.174 million, up 4.6% year on year, despite higher costs for idle personnel following the hiring of just under 100 new graduates across the group and active investment in 株式会社Quemix, which conducts quantum computing-related research and development, and TerraSky(Thailand)Co.,Ltd.（タイ法人）.」
In addition to the existing investment in Quemix, the Thai subsidiary and other entities, the company cites costs for idle personnel resulting from the hiring of just under 100 new graduates across the group as a profit factor. Solution business segment profit increased 4.6% year on year. - FY2024-Q1Investment targets updatedAnnual report
「Segment profit (operating profit) was ¥546.346 million, up 22.7% year on year, despite active investment in 株式会社Quemix, which conducts quantum computing-related research and development, TerraSky(Thailand)Co.,Ltd.（タイ法人）, and 株式会社エノキ, which develops AI applications.」
The explanation of profit factors now includes active investment in エノキ, which develops AI applications, in addition to the existing investment in Quemix, the Thai subsidiary and other entities. - FY2023Profit position updated following investment and hiringAnnual report
「Segment profit (operating profit) was ¥1,945.520 million, up 14.3% year on year, despite upfront investment at the launch stage in 株式会社Quemix, which conducts quantum computing-related research and development, 株式会社テラスカイ・テクノロジーズ, which provides engineer dispatch services, 株式会社リベルスカイ, which provides GCP-related services, TerraSky(Thailand)Co.,Ltd.（タイ法人）, and 株式会社DiceWorks（ダイスワークス）, which provides consulting on the implementation of Marketing Automation.」
DiceWorks, which provides consulting on the implementation of Marketing Automation, was added to the targets of upfront investment at the launch stage of new businesses. - FY2023-Q3Profit position updated following investment and hiringAnnual report
「Segment profit (operating profit) was ¥1,342.834 million, up 12.8% year on year, despite active investment in 株式会社Quemix, which conducts quantum computing-related research and development, the newly established 株式会社テラスカイ・テクノロジーズ and 株式会社リベルスカイ, and TerraSky(Thailand)Co.,Ltd.（タイ法人）, which had begun full-scale operations.」
The company cites active investment in the Thai subsidiary, in addition to Quemix, テラスカイ・テクノロジーズ and リベルスカイ, as a profit factor. - FY2023-Q2Profit position updated following hiring investmentAnnual report
「Segment loss (operating loss) was ¥22.436 million, compared with a segment loss (operating loss) of ¥9.593 million in the same period of the previous year, partly because costs increased as the company hired personnel for development of new mitoco functions and marketing personnel for the product business as a whole.」
In addition to the previously cited investment in new businesses and research and development, the company cites hiring personnel for development of new mitoco functions and marketing personnel for the product business as a factor behind higher product business costs. - FY2023-Q1Profit position updated amid continued investmentAnnual report
「Segment profit (operating profit) was ¥445.116 million, up 22.4% year on year, despite continued active investment in 株式会社Quemix, which conducts quantum computing-related research and development, and the newly established 株式会社テラスカイ・テクノロジーズ and 株式会社リベルスカイ.」
Although active investment in Quemix, テラスカイ・テクノロジーズ and リベルスカイ continued, solution business segment profit increased 22.4% year on year. - FY2022Subsidiary share valuation loss updatedAnnual report
「The losses comprised a ¥17.918 million valuation loss on TerraSky Inc., a consolidated subsidiary, a ¥777,000 valuation loss on TerraSky (Thailand) Co.,Ltd., and a ¥99.163 million valuation loss on 株式会社テラスカイ・テクノロジーズ.」
The filing company recorded a ¥117.859 million valuation loss on subsidiary shares as an extraordinary loss in net income for the period. - FY2022-Q3Third-quarter profit factors updatedAnnual report
「Segment profit (operating profit) was ¥1,190.779 million, down 0.6% year on year, while incorporating losses from investment in 株式会社Quemix, which conducts quantum computing-related research and development, and the newly established 株式会社テラスカイ・テクノロジーズ and 株式会社リベルスカイ. Progress remained ahead of the initial plan.」
The explanation was updated to cite losses from investment in Quemix, テラスカイ・テクノロジーズ and リベルスカイ as factors weighing on solution business profit. - FY2022-Q2Second-quarter profit factors updatedAnnual report
「Segment profit (operating profit) was ¥750.216 million, down 9.5% year on year, due to active investment in 株式会社Quemix, which conducts quantum computing-related research and development, and the newly established 株式会社テラスカイ・テクノロジーズ and 株式会社リベルスカイ, although progress remained ahead of the initial plan.」
The explanation was updated to cite active investment in Quemix, テラスカイ・テクノロジーズ and リベルスカイ as factors behind the 9.5% year-on-year decline in cumulative second-quarter solution business profit. - FY2022-Q1Profit pressure from investment in newly established subsidiaries and other entitiesAnnual report
「Segment profit (operating profit) was ¥363.569 million, down 12.2% year on year, due to active investment in 株式会社Quemix, which conducts quantum computing-related research and development, as well as the newly established 株式会社テラスカイテクノロジーズ and 株式会社リベルスカイ.」
The company cites active investment in Quemix, テラスカイ・テクノロジーズ and リベルスカイ, in addition to its existing investment in mitoco and other areas, as a factor behind the decline in solution business profit. - FY2019RestatedAnnual report
「Revenue increased, mainly because the number of contracted customers and contract value for existing products remained solid and grew, although expenses increased due to the development of additional functions for the new product mitoco.」
The company reconfirms for the full year that development costs for additional mitoco functions were a factor behind the decline in product business profit. - FY2019-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「However, to accommodate business expansion, the company expanded and relocated its head office in May and its Nagoya branch in July, recording non-recurring costs and incurring higher rent.」
The company again cites non-recurring costs and higher rent associated with expanding and relocating the head office and Nagoya branch as factors affecting profit. - FY2019-Q2Additional non-recurring cost factorAnnual report
「However, to accommodate business expansion, the company expanded and relocated its head office in May and its Nagoya branch in July, recording non-recurring costs and incurring higher rent.」
In addition to the previously cited hiring and investment in mitoco, the company cites non-recurring costs and higher rent associated with expanding and relocating the head office and Nagoya branch as factors affecting profit. - FY2019-Q1Additional temporary loss factorAnnual report
「Profit temporarily turned negative because costs were incurred in connection with the office relocation carried out in May 2018 as the number of employees increased. These costs were already factored into the full-year consolidated earnings forecast announced at the beginning of the fiscal year.」
In addition to the previously cited hiring and investment in mitoco, the company cites costs related to the May 2018 office relocation following the increase in employees as a factor that temporarily pushed quarterly profit into negative territory. - FY2018Full-year profit decline factors confirmedAnnual report
「Revenue increased, mainly because the number of contracted customers and contract value for existing products remained solid and grew, although expenses increased due to the development of additional functions for the new product mitoco.」
The company cites higher costs for developing additional mitoco functions as a factor behind the decline in full-year product business profit. - FY2017-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「Operating profit and ordinary profit declined from the same cumulative period of the previous year due to higher costs associated with advertising and other expenses for the new product mitoco, additional man-hours resulting from delays in certain development projects, higher outsourcing costs, accelerated hiring mainly of engineers, and losses recorded by subsidiaries.」
The company again cites mitoco advertising expenses, hiring, subsidiary losses, longer development projects and higher outsourcing costs as factors behind the decline in profit. - FY2017-Q2RestatedAnnual report
「Profit declined from the same cumulative period of the previous year due to accelerated hiring, mainly of engineers, losses recorded by subsidiaries, promotional activities including exhibiting the newly developed groupware product mitoco at cloud-related trade shows, certain development projects taking longer than planned, and higher outsourcing costs.」
The company cites hiring, subsidiary losses, mitoco promotions, longer development projects and higher outsourcing costs as factors behind the decline in profit. - FY2017-Q1First statedAnnual report
「As a result of hiring personnel, mainly engineers, recording the start-up loss of 株式会社BeeX, established in March, and conducting promotional activities such as exhibiting at cloud-related trade shows ahead of the July release of the newly developed groupware mitoco, operating profit and ordinary profit declined compared with the same quarter of the previous year.」
Revenue increased 32.2% year on year, while operating profit fell 65.4% and ordinary profit fell 29.2%.