Komori
Remixpoint (3825) · RiskWorsened

Delayed Customer Acquisition Due to Price Competition with Major Electric Power Companies and Others

First written in FY2017-Q2. 9 of 14 entries say "Worsened", first in FY2017-Q3. Latest entry: FY2026.

14entries
11years
2from disclosures
Share on X
How it moved
ProgressHeldSoftenedWorseWorsenedFY2018 – 2026-05-152016: 12017: 220172018: 120182019: 120192020: 120202021: 120212022: 120222023: 020232024: 220242025: 120252026: 32026
Same theme, other companies
Intensifying Competition from the Liberalization of Electricity and Gas RetailingA theme 30 companies write about · 35 as a headwind · 0 as a tailwind

Remixpoint moved to the "Worse" side of this theme in 2016, 2 years before the typical company in this theme (2018).

The whole theme swung hardest in 2024: 8 of 21 companies on the "Worse" side.

7 other companies' latest entry also says "Worsened".

Ridges = years it wrote progress, valleys = years it wrote worse. Most hopeful companies at the back. Drag to turn, scroll to zoom, right-drag to pan. On a phone, two fingers turn and pinch to zoom; one finger scrolls the page.
Showing 14 of the 30 companies compared. The sentences above are computed from all 30.
Full recordFilings, disclosures and news, newest first
  1. FY2026WorsenedAnnual report

    「In addition, a quantitative supply capacity obligation is scheduled to be imposed in 2030. This will require electricity retailers to secure, using physical power sources, 50% of forecast demand three fiscal years before the actual supply-demand period and 70% one fiscal year before it, suggesting that smaller operators may find it difficult to continue operating.」

    In addition to conventional price competition and the competitive and cost risks associated with non-fossil certificates and capacity market contribution payments, a new requirement to secure supply capacity from physical power sources, scheduled for 2030, has been specified.
  2. FY2025WorsenedAnnual report

    「The Act on Sophisticated Methods of Energy Supply Structures requires electricity retailers above a certain size to procure non-fossil certificates according to their sales volume. It sets a target of at least 44% non-fossil power sources in supplied electricity by 2030, and the government sets interim targets for each operator every year to increase the likelihood of achieving that target. As electricity retailers above a certain size, including us, must procure non-fossil certificates according to the volume of electricity sold, we are currently developing Non-FIT small-scale solar power plants. However, as our electricity retail business expands, our burden of procuring non-fossil certificates may increase in the future. In addition, electricity retailers must bear capacity market contribution payments to secure the overall supply capacity, or power generation volume, required nationwide, and the costs required for them to continue operating are expected to increase going forward.」

    The explanation of the competitive environment now also includes the target of at least 44% non-fossil power sources by 2030, the burden of procuring non-fossil certificates and structurally higher costs due to capacity market contribution payments.
  3. FY2025-H1MaterialisedAnnual report

    「The estimated total capacity market contribution payment to be borne by us for the fiscal year ending March 2025 is approximately ¥1,486 million. During the six-month period of the current interim consolidated fiscal year, approximately ¥745 million, representing six months' worth, was recorded as cost of sales and became a factor depressing profit.」

    Regarding the risk of future cost increases related to the capacity market, approximately ¥745 million in capacity market contribution payments for six months was actually recorded as cost of sales after the system began in April 2024, reducing profit.
  4. FY2024WorsenedAnnual report

    「The Act on Sophisticated Methods of Energy Supply Structures requires electricity retailers above a certain size to procure non-fossil certificates according to their sales volume. It sets a target of at least 44% non-fossil power sources in supplied electricity by 2030, and the government sets interim targets for each operator every year to increase the likelihood of achieving that target. As we do not own renewable energy power sources, procuring non-fossil certificates could become an excessive burden for us in the future. In addition, electricity retailers must bear capacity market contribution payments to secure the overall supply capacity, or power generation volume, required nationwide, and the costs required for them to continue operating are expected to increase going forward.」

    In addition to conventional price competition and the risk of surging electricity prices, it specifies the risk of structurally higher costs due to the obligation to procure non-fossil certificates and capacity market contribution payments.
  5. FY2022WorsenedAnnual report

    「Wholesale electricity market trading prices surged abnormally for two consecutive periods, in winter 2020 and winter 2021. Going forward, there are concerns that electricity trading prices may surge, particularly when electricity supply and demand are tight, or that it may not be possible to procure the volume of electricity required to meet demand, due to factors including continued high fuel prices.」

    Electricity prices surged for two consecutive periods, increasing concerns about persistently high fuel prices and difficulties procuring electricity when supply and demand are tight. It also mentions the suspension or withdrawal of electricity retailers and the suspension of new contract applications.
  6. FY2021WorsenedAnnual report

    「In addition, costs required for electricity retailers to continue operating are expected to increase going forward, due to requirements to decarbonize the electricity business toward carbon neutrality by 2050 and the emergence of capacity market contribution payments needed to secure the overall supply capacity, or power generation volume, required nationwide.」

    It states that, in addition to conventional price competition and customer win-back sales, electricity retailers face the risk of higher costs resulting from decarbonization measures and capacity market contribution payments.
  7. FY2020WorsenedAnnual report

    「Following the enforcement of the amended Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, registration as a financial instruments business operator became necessary to handle crypto-asset (cryptocurrency) derivatives transactions. In addition, changes in the market environment, including these regulations and lower leverage limits, have led some existing crypto-asset (cryptocurrency) exchange operators to withdraw from crypto-asset (cryptocurrency) derivatives transactions.」

    In addition to price competition in the electricity sector, the explanation of risks related to the competitive and regulatory environment in the financial sector has expanded to include the registration requirement for crypto-asset derivatives, lower leverage limits and withdrawals by existing operators.
  8. FY2019WorsenedAnnual report

    「In the financial-related business, operators must register as cryptocurrency exchange operators under the Payment Services Act and the Cabinet Office Ordinance Concerning Cryptocurrency Exchange Operators in order to conduct a cryptocurrency exchange business. As of 31 March 2019, there were 19 registered cryptocurrency exchange operators. However, while new registrations by major capital groups and others began in 2019, deemed cryptocurrency exchange operators have also withdrawn from the business, and the industry is rapidly undergoing selection and consolidation.」

    In addition to price competition in the electricity sector, the explanation of the competitive environment in the financial sector has expanded to include the entry of major capital groups, business withdrawals, higher costs accompanying tighter regulation and delays in responding to technological requirements.
  9. FY2018WorsenedAnnual report

    「In addition, there has been an increase in cases in which, when a customer applies to switch to a new electricity retailer, the incumbent retailer attempts to prevent the switch by offering the customer special rates or contacting the customer to demand a cancellation fee. This practice is known as customer win-back sales. “As a result of this competitive environment, not only may our group’s share fail to grow as expected, but electricity procurement prices may rise while electricity selling prices decline.”」

    The explanation of competitive risks has expanded beyond conventional price competition to include customer win-back sales, difficulties accessing low-cost baseload power sources, and the possibility of higher procurement prices and lower selling prices.
  10. FY2017RestatedAnnual report

    「The Company pursued various measures, including reviewing its cost structure and developing agency sales channels, but the number of electricity supply-and-demand contracts and the contracted electricity volume both fell short of the initial plan due to intensified price competition with major electric utilities and other new electricity providers, as well as customers' cautiousness about switching contracts.」

    It states that price competition among electric power companies and customers' cautious stance toward switching continued, and that the number of contracts and contracted electricity volume did not progress as initially planned.
  11. FY2017-Q3WorsenedAnnual report

    「In addition to external factors such as intensifying price competition among electricity retailers and weak customer sentiment toward switching electricity supply contracts, our inability to sufficiently implement effective agency initiatives resulted in electricity trading business revenue falling significantly short of the initial budget.」

    It states that electricity trading business revenue fell significantly short of the initial budget due to intensifying price competition among electricity retailers, weak customer willingness to switch and the inability to sufficiently implement effective agency initiatives.
  12. FY2017-Q2MaterialisedAnnual report

    「We are reviewing our cost structure, developing agency relationships and expanding our sales area to rebuild our sales operations, but new customer acquisition did not progress as initially planned due to price competition with major electric power companies, including new power providers.」

    It states that new customer acquisition did not progress as initially planned due to price competition with major electric power companies, including new power providers.
Moved together

"Risk of Dilution for Existing Shareholders from the Exercise of Stock Acquisition Rights" moved the same way as this thread, in the same document, in 10 of its 14 moves.

1087555★123456
  1. ★This thread
  2. 1Risk of Dilution for Existing Shareholders from the Exercise of Stock Acquisition Rights10×
  3. 2Risk of Market Turmoil and Economic Downturn Due to the UK's EU Withdrawal and Other Factors8×
  4. 3Cryptocurrency Price Surge and Contribution of Valuation Gains to Earnings7×
  5. 4Expansion of Energy-Saving Support and Subsidy Consulting5×
  6. 5Sharp Sales Decline and Shift to Operating, Ordinary and Net Losses5×
  7. 6Risks Related to Changes in Laws and Regulations and the Obtaining of Licenses, Approvals and Registrations5×

★ is this thread; numbers match the list above. The number on a line is how many documents both moved the same way in; lines between the other threads count the documents they moved together in too. Threads that move together often sit closer.

When this could move next
No upcoming earnings preview for Remixpoint yet. It last moved in the Earnings presentation of 2026-05-15: "Mitigated".
News
No news is linked to this thread yet. When an article touches it, it will appear here by date.
Delayed Customer Acquisition Due to Price Competition with Major Electric Power Companies and Others | Remixpoint,inc. (3825) | Komori