Worth reading
32Immaterial
Scored from 3 of 4 sectionsDirection
Mixed performance
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
1
peopleWording
Conditional
How definitive the wording is.Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Extraordinary (meeting number: Not disclosed)Date and timeNot disclosed (will be announced once decided)
Matters for resolution1 item
Removal of 1 Director
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Extraordinary (meeting number: Not disclosed) |
| Date and time | Not disclosed (will be announced once decided) |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal No. 1: Removal of 1 Director |
Items this document does not state (3)
Shareholder ProposalDirector nomineePercentage voting in favor
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The special investigation committee’s report identified outside work in violation of the employment rules, questions regarding the work performed for a subsidiary and its deliverables, improper subcontracting, unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, and the poaching and solicitation of employees, among other matters. It was therefore determined that the individual lacked the qualifications to serve as a director.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.