Against the backdrop of concerns that the wealth gap is widening as generative AI spreads, the author questions the ambiguous definition of “work only humans can do.” The article examines what work cannot be replaced by AI.
As generative AI and AI agents gain ground, the possibility that some human work will be replaced is increasing. Against this backdrop, the article points out that the idea that people should simply “do work only humans can do” is becoming more widespread.
The author critically questions the ambiguity at the heart of this idea: how should we define the tasks AI can replace and the value added that only humans can provide?
The article does not present a specific conclusion or investment recommendation. Instead, it encourages readers to consider the question as something that concerns them personally.