Worth reading
54Recurring
Scored from 2 of 4 sectionsDirection
Mixed performance
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
—
Displayed only when the document provides numerical figures.Wording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual (79th fiscal year)2026
Jun 26
Date and time(start time: Not disclosed)
Matters for resolution5 items (3 from the company, 2 from shareholders)
Appropriation of surplus
Election of 9 directors
Election of 1 Audit & Supervisory Board Member
Election of 1 director
Shareholder ProposalPartial amendments to the Articles of Incorporation
Shareholder Proposal
Shareholder Proposal
Yes. Proposal 4 concerned the election of 1 director, and Proposal 5 concerned partial amendments to the Articles of Incorporation. The Board of Directors' position was Not disclosed. Both proposals were rejected.
A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.Director nomineeThere were 10 director candidates (9 under the company proposal and 1 under the shareholder proposal). The numbers of new and outside candidates were Not disclosed.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual (79th fiscal year) |
| Date and time | 26 June 2026 (start time: Not disclosed) |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal No. 1: Appropriation of surplus, Proposal No. 2: Election of 9 directors, Proposal No. 3: Election of 1 Audit & Supervisory Board Member, Proposal 4: Election of 1 director, Proposal 5: Partial amendments to the Articles of Incorporation |
| Shareholder Proposal | Yes. Proposal 4 concerned the election of 1 director, and Proposal 5 concerned partial amendments to the Articles of Incorporation. The Board of Directors' position was Not disclosed. Both proposals were rejected. |
| Director nominee | There were 10 director candidates (9 under the company proposal and 1 under the shareholder proposal). The numbers of new and outside candidates were Not disclosed. |
Items this document does not state (1)
Percentage voting in favor
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.Proposals 1 through 3 submitted by the company were approved as originally proposed, while Proposals 4 and 5 submitted by shareholders were rejected.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.