Risks associated with climate change and decarbonization regulations
First written in FY2022. 1 of 4 entries say "Worsened", first in FY2023. Latest entry: FY2025.
12 other companies' latest entry also says "Other".
- FY2025Added investment in natural-disaster measures and analysis of financial impactsAnnual report
「During the fiscal year, we invested ¥1.9 billion in natural-disaster measures for base stations and network centers to reduce the risk of equipment damage and ensure the stable continuation of services during widespread power outages, as an adaptation measure for flood damage, the likelihood of which is trending upward as typhoons and linear rain bands become more frequent. Specifically, the investment included mobile and portable base stations, battery replacement and maintenance, and the deployment of portable generators. In addition, ¥300 million was recorded as disaster recovery costs.」
For climate-change risks, the company disclosed ¥1.9 billion in capital expenditures for adaptation measures against flooding and other events, together with ¥300 million in disaster recovery costs, expanding its scenario analysis and assessment of financial impacts. - FY2024Added disclosure of estimated carbon tax amountsAnnual report
「Under the 1.5°C scenario, we assumed that no acute or chronic physical risks from climate change would arise at a level affecting the business, while climate-change policies and regulations would be strengthened. We estimated the impact assuming a carbon tax of approximately ¥16,000 per tonne of CO2 equivalent would be imposed from 2025.」
For climate-change risks, the company assumed a carbon tax of approximately ¥16,000 per tonne from 2025 under the 1.5°C scenario and additionally disclosed an estimate of the financial impact. - FY2023WorsenedAnnual report
「Under the 1.5°C scenario, we identified regulatory risks, including carbon taxes, arising from increased electricity consumption. Under the 4°C scenario, we identified the risk that power outages caused by torrential rain disasters would increase the frequency of base-station shutdowns. For example, in the torrential rain disaster of July 2020, approximately ¥330 million was spent on restoration costs.」
For climate-change risks, the company conducted 1.5°C and 4°C scenario analyses and quantified financial impacts including carbon taxes, base-station shutdowns caused by torrential rain, and approximately ¥330 million in restoration costs. - FY2022First statedAnnual report
「However, despite these measures, our group's business development, financial condition and results of operations could be affected if climate change progresses and causes severe damage from natural disasters, or if new laws and regulations aimed at achieving a decarbonized society are introduced or strengthened, resulting in increased costs associated with the telecommunications networks and information-system equipment owned by our group.」
Alongside its 2030 carbon-neutral declaration and renewable-energy initiatives, the company separately identified for the first time the risks of natural disasters caused by climate change, decarbonization regulations, higher equipment costs and insufficient stakeholder understanding.