Items stated in the management plan
FormulatedThis document does not state the plan name, plan period, or numerical targets.
The Company took seriously the fact that its two previous lunar landing missions failed to achieve a soft landing and placed importance on the need to seek opinions from an independent third-party perspective.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Progress against the plan | Formulated |
| Key initiatives | Implement Terrain Relative Navigation (TRN), Utilize remaining fuel during landing operations, Improve the vendor selection process, Increase project resources allocated to testing, Design and verify fault detection, isolation, and recovery, Improve collaboration between ispace and Draper, Strengthen the Company’s approach to risk management |
| Reason for revision or withdrawal | The Company took seriously the fact that its two previous lunar landing missions failed to achieve a soft landing and placed importance on the need to seek opinions from an independent third-party perspective. |
| Risks identified | Technical and system-related factors associated with Mission 2’s failure to achieve a soft landing, Mission technology risks |
| Publication date | 27 March 2026 |
Items this document does not state (20)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Company took seriously Mission 2’s failure to achieve a soft landing in 2025 and sought to verify the validity of its analysis of the technical factors from the perspective of an independent third party, with the aim of raising the maturity of its lunar landing technology to a level sufficient for commercialization. At the same time, the Company aims to maintain trust with stakeholders through transparent disclosure.