Mitsui-Soko Holdings (9302) · RiskReframed
Reputational damage and exclusion from investment universes due to delays or errors in ESG initiatives
First written in FY2020. 1 of 2 entries say "Reframed", first in FY2026. Latest entry: FY2026.
2entries
7years
0from disclosures
How it moved
Same theme, other companies
Investor withdrawals and deterioration in fundraising due to insufficient ESG initiativesA theme 7 companies write about · 7 as a headwind · 0 as a tailwind
Mitsui-Soko Holdings moved to the "Worse" side of this theme in 2026.
0 other companies' latest entry also says "Reframed".
Ridges = years it wrote progress, valleys = years it wrote worse. Most hopeful companies at the back. Drag to turn, scroll to zoom, right-drag to pan. On a phone, two fingers turn and pinch to zoom; one finger scrolls the page.
Full recordFilings, disclosures and news, newest first
- FY2026ReframedAnnual report
「Delays or inadequacies in addressing these issues pose risks to the group’s sustainable growth, including reputational damage, exclusion from investment universes and declining competitiveness.」
ESG-related risks have been reorganized to cover not only climate change and human rights issues but also the effects on reputation, investment eligibility and competitiveness of inadequate responses to the 8 materiality areas. - FY2020First statedAnnual report
「If these initiatives are delayed or handled incorrectly, they could adversely affect the group’s sustainable growth through reputational damage or exclusion from investment universes.」
The risk of reputational damage and exclusion from investment universes if responses to ESG and materiality issues are delayed or inadequate was newly identified.