Governance structure
The Company conducted an evaluation of the Board of Directors' effectiveness and confirmed that the Board's operations had improved from the previous fiscal year. Going forward, it identified support for outside directors in acquiring and updating their knowledge, more active deliberations, and more substantive discussion of business risks as issues to be addressed.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Number of directors | Total: 9 directors (number of outside directors: Not disclosed) |
| Changes this time | The Company conducted an evaluation of the Board of Directors' effectiveness and confirmed that the Board's operations had improved from the previous fiscal year. Going forward, it identified support for outside directors in acquiring and updating their knowledge, more active deliberations, and more substantive discussion of business risks as issues to be addressed. |
Items this document does not state (6)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Company states that it confirmed improvements in the Board's operations and effectiveness because the Board was operated efficiently and deliberations focused on issues related to the medium-term management plan. Going forward, it identified support for outside directors in acquiring and updating their knowledge, more active deliberations, and more substantive discussion of business risks as issues to be addressed.