Worth reading
60In focus
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.Direction
Mixed performance
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
2
Reduction in the number of directors (people)Wording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual, 53rd2026
Jun 25
Date and time27 days from this disclosure to the meeting
Matters for resolution2 items
Appropriation of surplus
Election of 12 directors
Shareholder Proposal
No
A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.Director nominee12 (Not disclosed new, 6 outside directors)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual, 53rd |
| Date and time | 10:00 a.m., Thursday, 25 June 2026 |
| Matters for resolution | Appropriation of surplus, Election of 12 directors |
| Shareholder Proposal | No |
| Director nominee | 12 (Not disclosed new, 6 outside directors) |
Items this document does not state (1)
Percentage voting in favor
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.To reduce the number of directors by 2 so that the Board of Directors can make strategic and agile decisions.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.