Governance structure
As measures addressing issues identified in the previous fiscal year, the Company established a monitoring framework under which 1 director is responsible for improvements, revised the criteria for submitting matters to the Board of Directors, introduced a new category of matters for deliberation, and strengthened the provision of information to outside directors.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Committee | The policy is to integrate the Nomination Committee and the Compensation Committee and compose the combined committee solely of independent outside directors. The proportion of outside committee members has not been disclosed. |
| Changes this time | As measures addressing issues identified in the previous fiscal year, the Company established a monitoring framework under which 1 director is responsible for improvements, revised the criteria for submitting matters to the Board of Directors, introduced a new category of matters for deliberation, and strengthened the provision of information to outside directors. |
Items this document does not state (6)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Company conducts an evaluation each fiscal year to assess the current functioning of the Board of Directors and improve its effectiveness. An external organization is used to analyze the responses, ensuring objectivity.