The document this correction applies to
Timely disclosureWhat was corrected and how
A subsequent correction by the company to the contents of an already published filing.
Planned Disclosure Timing for the Third-Quarter Earnings Report for the Fiscal Year Ending October 2026 Following an Interim Review of the Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements by Certified Public Accountants, etc.
Open the original documentSome of the wording in the disclosure materials issued before this correction: wording suggesting that the Company had passively decided to commission an investigation by a third-party committee, and wording suggesting that the audit opinion of the audit firm could be prejudged.
The fact that we had received comments and requests from the audit firm, and that the wording could have appeared to prejudge the audit firm's audit opinion.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Disclosure subject to correction | Planned Disclosure Timing for the Third-Quarter Earnings Report for the Fiscal Year Ending October 2026 Following an Interim Review of the Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements by Certified Public Accountants, etc. |
| Original disclosure date | 29 October 2026 |
| Location of correction | Some of the wording in the disclosure materials issued before this correction: wording suggesting that the Company had passively decided to commission an investigation by a third-party committee, and wording suggesting that the audit opinion of the audit firm could be prejudged. |
| Reason for correction | The fact that we had received comments and requests from the audit firm, and that the wording could have appeared to prejudge the audit firm's audit opinion. |
Items this document does not state (2)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.In response to comments and requests from the audit firm, it was necessary to revise wording that suggested the Company had passively decided to commission an investigation by a third-party committee, so that it reflected the Company's proactive decision. It was also necessary to revise wording that could have prejudged the audit firm's audit opinion to make it more appropriate.