Worth reading
42Recurring
Scored from 2 of 4 sectionsDirection
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
—
Displayed only when the document provides numerical figures.Wording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual (56th fiscal year)2026
Jun 26
Date and time(start time: Not disclosed)
Matters for resolution2 items
Election of 9 directors
Election of 1 statutory auditor
Shareholder Proposal
None (no shareholder proposal is stated in the document)
A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.Director nominee9 candidates (number of new candidates: Not disclosed; number of outside candidates: Not disclosed)
Percentage voting in favorAs the voting results, the approval rates for the candidates under Proposal No. 1 were as follows: Suganuma Masaaki (菅沼正明) 96.79%, Hirano Shoichi (平野昇一) 98.04%, Arai Takashi (新井貴) 97.60%, Tsukada Yuichi (塚田雄一) 97.65%, Hagiwara Takako (萩原貴子) 98.35%, Segi Tatsuaki (瀬木達明) 99.44%, Matoba Miyuki (的場美友紀) 99.45%, Makizumi Tsukasa (牧角司) 92.71%, and Tsushima Kojiro (對間康二郎) 92.69%. Under Proposal No. 2, Koizumi Yoshiyuki (小泉吉之) received an approval rate of 97.29%.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual (56th fiscal year) |
| Date and time | 26 June 2026 (start time: Not disclosed) |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal No. 1: Election of 9 directors, Proposal No. 2: Election of 1 statutory auditor |
| Shareholder Proposal | None (no shareholder proposal is stated in the document) |
| Director nominee | 9 candidates (number of new candidates: Not disclosed; number of outside candidates: Not disclosed) |
| Percentage voting in favor | As the voting results, the approval rates for the candidates under Proposal No. 1 were as follows: Suganuma Masaaki (菅沼正明) 96.79%, Hirano Shoichi (平野昇一) 98.04%, Arai Takashi (新井貴) 97.60%, Tsukada Yuichi (塚田雄一) 97.65%, Hagiwara Takako (萩原貴子) 98.35%, Segi Tatsuaki (瀬木達明) 99.44%, Matoba Miyuki (的場美友紀) 99.45%, Makizumi Tsukasa (牧角司) 92.71%, and Tsushima Kojiro (對間康二郎) 92.69%. Under Proposal No. 2, Koizumi Yoshiyuki (小泉吉之) received an approval rate of 97.29%. |
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The proposals met the approval requirements based on a tally of voting rights for which votes for and against were confirmed, including those exercised in advance and those of some shareholders attending on the day. Voting rights for which the votes could not be confirmed were not included.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.