Addressing reputational and deposit outflow risks by building trusted relationships
First written in FY2016. 5 of 6 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2022.
No other company in this theme has enough history to compare yet.
- FY2022RestatedAnnual report
「The bank recognizes that, for a financial institution such as itself, reputational damage, particularly damage to its credibility, could result in unexpected losses.」
The bank continues to recognize the possibility of reputational damage and deposit outflows as a risk. - FY2021RestatedAnnual report
「The bank recognizes that, for a financial institution such as itself, reputational damage, particularly damage to its credibility, could result in unexpected losses.」
The bank continues to recognize the possibility of reputational damage and deposit outflows as a risk. - FY2020RestatedAnnual report
「The bank recognizes that, for a financial institution such as itself, reputational damage, particularly damage to its credibility, could result in unexpected losses.」
The bank continues to recognize the possibility of reputational damage and deposit outflows as a risk. - FY2018RestatedAnnual report
「The bank recognizes that, for a financial institution such as itself, reputational damage, particularly damage to its credibility, could result in unexpected losses.」
The bank continues to recognize the possibility of reputational damage and deposit outflows as a risk. - FY2017RestatedAnnual report
「Regarding this risk, the bank previously experienced deposit outflows originating from malicious rumors. Although it was deeply regrettable that the rumors caused such a situation, the bank has worked to build relationships in which it is more familiar and trusted by depositors. As a result, total deposits have increased every fiscal year consecutively since March 2005.」
The bank reiterates the previous deposit outflows caused by reputational damage, along with its efforts to build trust with depositors and the continuous increase in total deposits, as its response and track record. - FY2016First statedAnnual report
「The bank recognizes that, for a financial institution such as itself, reputational damage, particularly damage to its credibility, could result in unexpected losses.」
The bank states that it previously experienced deposit outflows originating from malicious rumors, and presents the subsequent building of trust with depositors and the continuous increase in total deposits since March 2005 as its response and track record.