Komori
Occurring Fact8358Suruga Bank Ltd.Banks

Notice Concerning the Filing of an Appeal Against the Judgment in the Remanded Case Relating to the Founding Family-Owned Company Issue

All former directors and their heirs and successors in the litigation have appealed the judgment on remand dated 13 March 2026, and the damages claim proceedings will continue before the Tokyo High Court. The impact of filing the appeal on current fiscal-year results is expected to be minor.

Worth reading
47Recurring
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.
Direction
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.
Scale
4762008000
¥
Wording
Conditional
How definitive the wording is.

Filing of an Appeal Against the Judgment on Remand Concerning the Founding Family-Affiliated Companies Issue

Subject Entity

Suruga Bank Ltd., 4 former directors, and their heirs and successors in the litigation

Target Locations / Products

Credit management issue involving the founding family-affiliated companies

Occurrence25 March 2026 (date the appeal was filed)
56 days later
Awareness or receipt of notice20 May 2026 (receipt of the notice of appeal from the Tokyo High Court)
Litigation / administrative action25 March 2026 (date the appeal was filed). The judgment on remand was issued on 13 March 2026
This disclosure05/20/2026
Cause

Credit management issue involving the founding family-affiliated companies

Related procedures

Type

Appeal in the damages claim proceedings

Court or authority

Tokyo High Court; Shizuoka District Court

Plaintiff

Suruga Bank Ltd.

Defendant

4 former directors and their heirs and successors in the litigation

Claim amount / surcharge amount

¥4,762,008,000 (the total amount the Company may receive from the respective former directors)

Amount of Impact on Business Performance

The impact on current fiscal-year results is minor

Accounting period in which recognized

Current fiscal year

Impact on Earnings Forecast

The impact of filing the appeal on current fiscal-year results is minor

Outlook

The Company will continue to respond appropriately so that a fair and reasonable judgment is rendered on the Company's claims in the appellate proceedings.

Planned follow-up disclosure

The specific timing of further disclosure regarding the appeal case is not disclosed. Regarding the separate share-house lending issue, the Company states that it will promptly disclose any matters requiring disclosure as they arise.

Event that occurred
ItemDetails
Event nameFiling of an Appeal Against the Judgment on Remand Concerning the Founding Family-Affiliated Companies Issue
Date of occurrence25 March 2026 (date the appeal was filed)
Date recognized / date notice received20 May 2026 (receipt of the notice of appeal from the Tokyo High Court)
Subject EntitySuruga Bank Ltd., 4 former directors, and their heirs and successors in the litigation
Target Locations / ProductsCredit management issue involving the founding family-affiliated companies
CauseCredit management issue involving the founding family-affiliated companies
Amount of Impact on Business PerformanceThe impact on current fiscal-year results is minor
Accounting period in which recognizedCurrent fiscal year
Impact on Earnings ForecastThe impact of filing the appeal on current fiscal-year results is minor
Type of litigation or proceedingAppeal in the damages claim proceedings
Court or authorityTokyo High Court; Shizuoka District Court
PlaintiffSuruga Bank Ltd.
Defendant4 former directors and their heirs and successors in the litigation
Date of filing / date of action25 March 2026 (date the appeal was filed). The judgment on remand was issued on 13 March 2026
Claim amount / surcharge amount¥4,762,008,000 (the total amount the Company may receive from the respective former directors)
OutlookThe Company will continue to respond appropriately so that a fair and reasonable judgment is rendered on the Company's claims in the appellate proceedings.
Planned follow-up disclosureThe specific timing of further disclosure regarding the appeal case is not disclosed. Regarding the separate share-house lending issue, the Company states that it will promptly disclose any matters requiring disclosure as they arise.
Items this document does not state (8)
Amount of receivables at risk of non-collection or delayed collectionSuspended operationsScheduled resumption dateInvestigation structureMeasures to prevent recurrenceDirectors' and officers' liabilityVoting rights ownership percentage before the changeVoting rights ownership percentage after the change

These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.

The reasons the company gives

The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.

The former directors and others filed an appeal because they disagreed with the judgment on remand.

How to read this page

This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.
Notice Concerning the Filing of an Appeal Against the Judgment in the Remanded Case Relating to the Founding Family-Owned Company Issue | Suruga Bank Ltd. (8358) timely disclosure | Komori