Reputational Risk from Climate Change and Environmental Impacts
First written in FY2022. 2 of 3 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2024.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2026: 1 of 7 companies on the "Worse" side.
3 other companies' latest entry also says "Restated".
- FY2024RestatedAnnual report
「If the Group's efforts to address climate change, such as reducing energy use and greenhouse-gas emissions and switching to renewable energy, are deemed insufficient, or if it fails to appropriately reduce waste emissions such as plastic waste and hazardous chemicals or use water resources efficiently, its social credibility could decline and its brand could be damaged.」
気候変動対応、廃棄物・有害化学物質・水資源管理が不十分な場合の信用・ブランド毀損リスクを再掲している。 - FY2023RestatedAnnual report
「If the Group's efforts to address climate change, such as reducing energy use and greenhouse-gas emissions and switching to renewable energy, are deemed insufficient, or if it fails to appropriately reduce waste emissions such as plastic waste and hazardous chemicals or use water resources efficiently, its social credibility could decline and its brand could be damaged.」
気候変動対応、廃棄物・有害化学物質・水資源管理が不十分な場合の信用・ブランド毀損リスクを再掲している。 - FY2022First statedAnnual report
「If the Group's efforts to address climate change, such as reducing energy use and greenhouse-gas emissions and switching to renewable energy, are deemed insufficient, or if it fails to appropriately reduce waste emissions such as plastic waste and hazardous chemicals or use water resources efficiently, its social credibility could decline and its brand could be damaged.」
The risk that inadequate climate action, waste and hazardous-chemical management, or water-resource management could damage the Group's reputation and brand was separately identified as a business risk.