Payment claim lawsuit filed by ユーピテル株式会社
First written in FY2017-Q1. 1 of 3 entries say "Mitigated", first in FY2017-Q2. Latest entry: FY2017-Q3.
This thread is not in a theme yet. When the same subject shows up in other companies' filings, you can compare them here.
- FY2017-Q3DroppedAnnual report
「During the cumulative third quarter under review, there were no material changes in matters described in this quarterly report concerning the business and accounting conditions that could materially affect investors' decisions, or in the “Business and Other Risks” described in the annual securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
The specific disclosure concerning the lawsuit filed by ユーピテル株式会社 was not repeated in the quarterly securities report. The risk section stated that there had been no material changes. - FY2017-Q2MitigatedAnnual report
「Although the company had been fully contesting the plaintiff's claims, it concluded that settlement was appropriate in light of the benefits of resolving the dispute at an early stage and the amount of the settlement payment, and reached a court settlement on 12 September 2016.」
Regarding the lawsuit filed by ユーピテル株式会社 seeking payment of ¥100 million and other amounts, the parties reached a court settlement on 12 September 2016, moving toward resolution of the dispute. - FY2017-Q1First statedAnnual report
「On 7 November 2014, ユーピテル株式会社 filed a lawsuit with the Tokyo District Court seeking payment of ¥100 million plus delinquency damages. The company could not accept the plaintiff's claims and intended to clarify the facts through the proceedings.」
A lawsuit has been filed by ユーピテル株式会社 seeking payment of ¥100 million and delinquency damages. The company stated that it would not accept the claims and would clarify the facts through the proceedings.