Decision and Details
Ehime Prefecture (authority issuing the measure)Suspension of bidding eligibility for a consolidated subsidiary
Because violations of Article 3, paragraph 1, Article 4, paragraph 5, and Article 5, paragraph 1, item 2 of the Freelance Act were found, and the Japan Fair Trade Commission issued a recommendation on 18 June 2026.
The impact on the consolidated results for the fiscal year ending March 2027 is expected to be immaterial.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Matter Covered | Suspension of bidding eligibility for a consolidated subsidiary |
| Decision-Making Body | Ehime Prefecture (authority issuing the measure) |
| Decision Date | 7 July 2026 (disclosure date; the date on which notice of the measure was received is not stated) |
| Implementation Date | From 6 July 2026 to 5 September 2026 (in effect and scheduled) |
| Period Covered | From 6 July 2026 to 5 September 2026 (2 months) |
| Quantity / scale | Suspension of bidding eligibility: 2 months |
| Impact on Business Performance | The impact on the consolidated results for the fiscal year ending March 2027 is expected to be immaterial. |
| Reason | Because violations of Article 3, paragraph 1, Article 4, paragraph 5, and Article 5, paragraph 1, item 2 of the Freelance Act were found, and the Japan Fair Trade Commission issued a recommendation on 18 June 2026. |
| Governing Rule | Act on the Improvement of Transparency and Fairness of Specified Entrusted Business Transactions (Freelance Act), Article 3, paragraph 1, Article 4, paragraph 5, and Article 5, paragraph 1, item 2 |
| Future plans | The Company will further strengthen its supervisory functions over the company and rigorously implement measures to prevent recurrence. If an event requiring public disclosure occurs, the Company will disclose it promptly. |
Items this document does not state (2)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.株式会社エス・ピー・シー was found to have violated the obligations under the Freelance Act to disclose transaction terms and pay remuneration by the due date, as well as the prohibition on reducing remuneration, and received a recommendation from the Japan Fair Trade Commission to ensure fair transactions and prevent recurrence.