Capital efficiency and investment payback management based on ROA and EBITDA
First written in FY2020. 2 of 3 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2022.
No other company in this theme has enough history to compare yet.
- FY2022RestatedAnnual report
「We place importance on ROA and EBITDA as indicators for measuring capital efficiency and investment returns. However, specific medium- to long-term management target figures are currently undetermined because they are difficult to calculate reasonably at this time, partly due to the impact of the spread of COVID-19.」
The policy of placing importance on ROA and EBITDA as indicators of capital efficiency and investment returns continues, but specific medium- to long-term numerical targets remain undetermined. - FY2021RestatedAnnual report
「We place importance on ROA and EBITDA as indicators for measuring capital efficiency and investment returns. However, specific medium- to long-term management target figures are currently undetermined because they are difficult to calculate reasonably at this time, partly due to the impact of the spread of COVID-19.」
The policy of placing importance on ROA and EBITDA as indicators of capital efficiency and investment returns continues, but specific medium- to long-term numerical targets remain undetermined. - FY2020First statedAnnual report
「We place importance on ROA and EBITDA as indicators for measuring capital efficiency and investment returns. However, specific medium- to long-term management target figures are currently undetermined because they are difficult to calculate reasonably at this time, partly due to the impact of the spread of COVID-19.」
A policy of placing importance on ROA and EBITDA as indicators for measuring capital efficiency and investment returns on the large-scale investment in the Sakura Plant was explicitly stated for the first time, but specific numerical targets remained undetermined.