Impact on profit from a change in the method for estimating provisions for points
First written in FY2019-Q3. 1 of 2 entries say "Reframed", first in FY2022-Q1. Latest entry: FY2022-Q1.
Kotobukiya moved to the "Worse" side of this theme in 2021.
0 other companies' latest entry also says "Reframed".
- FY2022-Q1ReframedAnnual report
「Previously, the Company recorded as a points provision the amount of points granted that was expected to be used in the future, and recorded the expense associated with the points provision as selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company has changed to a method under which the points granted are identified as performance obligations and the transaction price is allocated based on the standalone selling price calculated after taking into account expected future expirations and other factors.」
Following the adoption of the revenue recognition accounting standard, the Company changed from recording a points provision to allocating the transaction price by treating points as performance obligations. - FY2019-Q3First statedAnnual report
「Previously, to provide for the use of points granted to members, the company recorded the full balance of points at the end of each accounting period as the estimated amount to be used in its provision for point benefits. As actual data on expired points became available, the company changed its method from the third quarter accounting period under review to record the balance of points after deducting estimated expired points. As a result, operating income, ordinary income and profit before income taxes for the cumulative third quarter under review each increased by ¥33.682 million.」
The estimation method was changed to reflect actual expired-point results, increasing operating profit, ordinary profit and profit before tax for the quarter by ¥33,682 thousand each.