Product Liability and Reputational Damage Resulting from Product Defects
First written in FY2017. 3 of 5 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2024.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2026: 11 of 57 companies on the "Worse" side.
- FY2024RestatedAnnual report
「Although the Group has established a sophisticated quality-assurance system, if a product defect leading to substantial product liability were to occur, it could result in significant costs or damage to the Group's reputation and materially affect its results.」
品質保証体制を前提としつつ、大規模な製品欠陥による費用負担・信用低下リスクを継続して開示している。 - FY2022RestatedAnnual report
「当該リスクが顕在化する可能性を最小化するため、品質保証体制の継続的な強化、品質不良発生時の対策と流出防止の徹底を図っております。」
製品欠陥リスクに対する品質保証体制の強化と不良流出防止を継続している。 - FY2021MitigatedAnnual report
「当該リスクが顕在化する可能性を最小化するため、品質保証体制の継続的な強化、品質不良発生時の対策と流出防止の徹底を図っております。」
製品欠陥リスクに対して、品質保証体制の継続強化と不良発生時の流出防止を具体的な対応として記載している。 - FY2019RestatedAnnual report
「Although the Group has established a sophisticated quality-assurance system, if a product defect leading to substantial product liability were to occur, it could result in significant costs or damage to the Group's reputation and materially affect its results.」
品質保証体制を前提としつつ、大規模な製品欠陥による費用負担・信用低下リスクを再掲している。 - FY2017First statedAnnual report
「Although the Group has established a sophisticated quality-assurance system, if a product defect leading to substantial product liability were to occur, it could result in significant costs or damage to the Group's reputation and materially affect its results.」
The company discloses the risk of costs and reputational damage from a major product defect despite having a quality-assurance system.