Risk of reputational damage and cost burdens arising from personal information leaks
First written in FY2017. 2 of 4 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2023.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2025: 6 of 26 companies on the "Worse" side.
62 other companies' latest entry also says "Restated".
- FY2023RestatedAnnual report
「We established a Personal Information Protection Management Committee to oversee the protection and management of personal information within our Group, formulate specific rules governing the handling of personal information, and promote understanding and adoption of these rules within the Group.」
A management and training structure involving the Personal Information Protection Management Committee, Group-wide rules and the heads of each department continues to be maintained. - FY2020ReframedAnnual report
「We established a Personal Information Protection Management Committee, chaired by Director 野々下, to oversee the protection and management of personal information within our Group. We have formulated specific rules governing the handling of personal information within the Group and are working to promote understanding and adoption of these rules.」
As measures to address the risk of personal information leaks, the company details a management structure that includes a committee, Group-wide rules, those responsible at each Group company and department, and training. - FY2018RestatedAnnual report
「If this personal information is leaked externally, our company and Group may be adversely affected in terms of business performance and financial position due to damage to the Group's image and social credibility, as well as the costs of responding to the incident.」
The company continues to disclose the risks of reputational damage, response costs and impacts on business performance resulting from personal information leaks. - FY2017First statedAnnual report
「If this personal information is leaked externally, our company and Group may be adversely affected in terms of business performance and financial position due to damage to the Group's image and social credibility, as well as the costs of responding to the incident.」
The company identifies reputational damage and response costs resulting from the external leakage of personal information concerning customers, employees and shareholders as risks.