Antimonopoly Act Compliance and Robust Company-Wide Internal Controls
First written in FY2016-Q3. 2 of 4 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2022.
Fuso Dentsu moved to the "Worse" side of this theme in 2016.
2 other companies' latest entry also says "Restated".
- FY2022RestatedAnnual report
「Against a backdrop of growing interest in corporate social responsibility and the enactment and amendment of new laws and regulations with a major impact on corporate activities, risks related to compliance, covering not only laws and regulations but also corporate ethics, are increasing.」
The company continued to describe its recognition of compliance risks, including laws, regulations and corporate ethics, and its response through the Risk and Compliance Committee, the Compliance Promotion Office and employee training. - FY2019RestatedAnnual report
「Risks related to compliance, covering not only laws and regulations but also corporate ethics, are increasing.」
The company continued to describe its recognition of compliance risks, including laws, regulations and corporate ethics, and its response through the Compliance Committee, the Compliance Promotion Office and employee training. - FY2018ReframedAnnual report
「Against a backdrop of growing interest in corporate social responsibility and the enactment and amendment of new laws and regulations with a major impact on corporate activities, risks related to compliance, covering not only laws and regulations but also corporate ethics, are increasing.」
The focus was expanded from the response to a past antimonopoly investigation to general compliance risks, including laws, regulations and corporate ethics, with responses through the Compliance Committee, the Compliance Promotion Office and employee training described. - FY2016-Q3MaterialisedAnnual report
「On 19 May 2015, the company underwent an on-site inspection by the Japan Fair Trade Commission on suspicion of violating the Antimonopoly Act in transactions involving power-system telecommunications equipment. On 12 July 2016, the company received an oral warning from the Commission to reinforce its compliance awareness, without being subject to the disposition announced by the Commission. The company will continue to pay even closer attention to compliance with the Antimonopoly Act and work to further strengthen, develop and operate company-wide internal controls.」
An on-site inspection and oral warning occurred in connection with suspected violations of the Antimonopoly Act. The company stated that it had not been subject to a disposition and would continue to reinforce, develop and operate its compliance framework and internal controls.