Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual (81st)Election of 4 directors, excluding directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee members
Election of 3 directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee members
Partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
Shareholder ProposalAppropriation of surplus
Shareholder Proposal
1 shareholder. Proposal No. 3 concerns an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to make shareholder approval of dividend-related matters a matter for resolution at a general meeting of shareholders. Proposal No. 4 concerns a dividend of ¥100 per share. The Board of Directors opposes both proposals.
A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual (81st) |
| Date and time | 10:00 a.m., Thursday, 25 June 2026 |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal No. 1: Election of 4 directors, excluding directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee members, Proposal No. 2: Election of 3 directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee members, Proposal No. 3: Partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, Proposal No. 4: Appropriation of surplus |
| Shareholder Proposal | 1 shareholder. Proposal No. 3 concerns an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to make shareholder approval of dividend-related matters a matter for resolution at a general meeting of shareholders. Proposal No. 4 concerns a dividend of ¥100 per share. The Board of Directors opposes both proposals. |
| Director nominee | 7 candidates. Of these, 1 is a new candidate and 2 are outside directors. |
Items this document does not state (1)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The company’s proposal concerns the election of directors due to the expiration of their terms. Regarding its opposition to the shareholder proposals, the company explains that it is appropriate for the Board of Directors to make prompt and flexible decisions on dividends based on factors including business performance, the payout ratio and financial condition, and that a dividend of ¥100 per share would erode the retained earnings that should be secured and would not contribute to enhancing corporate value over the medium to long term.