Litigation brought by 株式会社ケーエムミュージック seeking payment of fees and other amounts
First written in FY2024. 2 of 4 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2026.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2025: 12 of 70 companies on the "Worse" side.
16 other companies' latest entry also says "Mitigated".
- FY2026MitigatedAnnual report
「The Company had been sued by 株式会社ケーエムミュージック for ¥27.649 million in claims for payment of remuneration and other amounts relating to the business outsourcing agreement entered into on 13 March 2023, but paid ¥20 million effective 30 April 2026 and reached a settlement.」
The ¥27.649 million lawsuit brought by 株式会社ケーエムミュージック was settled after payment of ¥20 million effective 30 April 2026. - FY2026-H1RestatedAnnual report
「The Company has been sued by 株式会社ケーエムミュージック for ¥27.649 million in claims for payment of remuneration and other amounts relating to the business outsourcing agreement entered into on 13 March 2023.」
The ¥27.649 million lawsuit brought by 株式会社ケーエムミュージック seeking payment of remuneration and other amounts remains pending, and it remains difficult to reasonably estimate the amount of any impact. - FY2025RestatedAnnual report
「The Company has been sued by 株式会社ケーエムミュージック for ¥27.649 million in claims for payment of remuneration and other amounts relating to the business outsourcing agreement entered into on 13 March 2023.」
The ¥27.649 million lawsuit brought by 株式会社ケーエムミュージック seeking payment of remuneration and other amounts remains pending before the Tokyo District Court, and the Company continues to state that it is difficult to reasonably estimate the amount of any impact. - FY2024First statedAnnual report
「The Company has been sued by 株式会社ケーエムミュージック for ¥27.649 million in claims for payment of remuneration and other amounts relating to the business outsourcing agreement entered into on 13 March 2023.」
The Company is facing a ¥27.649 million lawsuit seeking payment of remuneration and other amounts relating to a business outsourcing agreement, which is pending before the Tokyo District Court. The Company considers the claim unfounded and states that it is difficult to reasonably estimate the amount of any impact.