Litigation over a reassessment under the anti-tax haven rules
First written in FY2017. 4 of 5 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2022-Q3.
No other company in this theme has enough history to compare yet.
- FY2022-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「No new business or other risks arose during the cumulative third quarter, and there were no material changes to the business and other risks described in the annual securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
The company states that there have been no new developments or material changes concerning litigation risk over reassessment under the anti-tax-haven rules. - FY2020-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「No new business or other risks arose during the cumulative third quarter, and there were no material changes to the business and other risks described in the annual securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
The company states that there have been no new developments or material changes concerning litigation risk over reassessment under the anti-tax-haven rules. - FY2018-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「No new business or other risks arose during the cumulative third quarter, and there were no material changes to the business and other risks described in the annual securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
The company states that there have been no new developments or material changes concerning litigation risk over reassessment under the anti-tax-haven rules. - FY2018-Q2RestatedAnnual report
「No new business or other risks arose during the six-month cumulative period under review. There were also no material changes to the business and other risks described in the annual securities report for the previous consolidated fiscal year.」
The company states that there have been no new developments or material changes concerning litigation risk over reassessment under the anti-tax-haven rules. - FY2017MaterialisedAnnual report
「For the fiscal years ended March 2008 and March 2009, and the fiscal years ended March 2010 and March 2011, the Nagoya Regional Taxation Bureau issued reassessments on the grounds that the company did not meet the requirements for exemption from application of the anti-tax-haven rules. The payment of ¥7,289 million has been recorded under Other non-current assets rather than included in corporate income tax expense.」
Litigation proceedings are continuing before the Supreme Court and the Nagoya High Court concerning additional tax assessments totaling ¥7,289 million.