Repair cost burden arising from product failures in power supply equipment
First written in FY2017-Q2. 2 of 3 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2017.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2026: 11 of 58 companies on the "Worse" side.
- FY2017RestatedAnnual report
「In addition to the impact of lower revenue, expenses for measures taken in response to product failures in the power supply equipment business were recorded, and the Company therefore remained in the red through the nine-month cumulative period, although」
Expenses for measures taken in response to product failures are again cited as a factor that pressured full-year profit. - FY2017-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「In addition to the impact of lower revenue, the power supply equipment business recorded expenses for measures taken in response to product failures. As a result, the operating loss was ¥196 million, compared with operating profit of ¥1,385 million in the same period of the previous fiscal year.」
Expenses for measures taken in response to product failures were recorded in the first half and affected the cumulative-period operating loss. - FY2017-Q2MaterialisedAnnual report
「In addition to the impact of lower revenue, the power supply equipment business incurred repair costs in response to product failures. As a result, the operating loss was ¥304 million, compared with operating profit of ¥1,032 million in the same period of the previous fiscal year.」
Repair costs were actually incurred in response to product failures in power supply equipment, contributing to the ¥267 million segment loss in the power supply equipment business.