Who is moving to which position
Resolved 10 April 2026Departing officer
1 itemThe Company determined that Uno Hikaru (宇野 輝), an outside director, had engaged in conduct in breach of his duty of care, including violating confidentiality obligations regarding discussions at meetings of the Board of Directors and other bodies, and obstructing business by disseminating defamatory statements about other officers. The Company also determined that he was not qualified to serve as a director because he failed to comply when the Board of Directors requested that he rectify the violations, among other reasons.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Resolution date | 10 April 2026 |
| Date of departure | At the conclusion of the 92nd ordinary general meeting of shareholders scheduled for June 2026 (if the dismissal proposal is approved) |
| Name of departing officer | Uno Hikaru (宇野 輝) |
| Former position of departing officer | Outside directors |
| Reason for departure | The Company determined that Uno Hikaru (宇野 輝), an outside director, had engaged in conduct in breach of his duty of care, including violating confidentiality obligations regarding discussions at meetings of the Board of Directors and other bodies, and obstructing business by disseminating defamatory statements about other officers. The Company also determined that he was not qualified to serve as a director because he failed to comply when the Board of Directors requested that he rectify the violations, among other reasons. |
| Subject to Approval by the General Meeting of Shareholders | Required. A proposal to dismiss a director will be submitted to the 92nd ordinary general meeting of shareholders scheduled for June 2026. The date, venue and other details of the meeting have not yet been determined. |
Items this document does not state (15)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Company determined that he had engaged in conduct in breach of his duty of care, including violating confidentiality obligations regarding discussions at meetings of the Board of Directors and other bodies, and obstructing business by disseminating defamatory statements about other officers. The Company also determined that he was not qualified to serve as a director because he failed to comply when the Board of Directors requested that he rectify the violations.