Change in Accounting Auditor
TB GROUP INC.
監査法人まほろば received notice that its registration on the register of auditors of listed companies, etc. had been refused and therefore could no longer continue auditing the company.
Related procedures
Disposition refusing registration on the register of auditors of listed companies, etc.
Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants
The company plans to submit the appointment of an accounting auditor to the 92nd Annual General Meeting of Shareholders scheduled for 26 June 2026, and the accounting auditor is scheduled to change to 清流監査法人 at the conclusion of the shareholders’ meeting on the same day. The company plans to receive cooperation from 監査法人まほろば in the handover of audit services.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Event name | Change in Accounting Auditor |
| Date of occurrence | 26 June 2026 (予定) |
| Subject Entity | TB GROUP INC. |
| Cause | 監査法人まほろば received notice that its registration on the register of auditors of listed companies, etc. had been refused and therefore could no longer continue auditing the company. |
| Type of litigation or proceeding | Disposition refusing registration on the register of auditors of listed companies, etc. |
| Court or authority | Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants |
| Outlook | The company plans to submit the appointment of an accounting auditor to the 92nd Annual General Meeting of Shareholders scheduled for 26 June 2026, and the accounting auditor is scheduled to change to 清流監査法人 at the conclusion of the shareholders’ meeting on the same day. The company plans to receive cooperation from 監査法人まほろば in the handover of audit services. |
Items this document does not state (18)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.監査法人まほろば received notice that its registration on the register of auditors of listed companies, etc. had been refused, making it impossible for the firm to continue providing audit services. After comparing the suitability of the audit services and the reasonableness of audit fees for a new audit firm in light of the company’s business scale, the company determined that the new audit firm was appropriate.