Worth reading
41Recurring
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.Direction
Mixed performance
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
50
¥10,000Wording
Conditional
How definitive the wording is.Resolution of damages claim litigation through settlement
Subject Entity
シャープ株式会社（当社）
Target Locations / Products
当社が製造した発光素子
Occurrence2025年2月26日
（和解成立日）
Litigation / administrative action提訴日：2022年3月24日、和解成立日：2025年2月26日
This disclosure02/26/2025
Cause
原告らは、当社が製造した発光素子に不具合があると主張
Related procedures
Type
Settlement of a damages claim lawsuit
Court or authority
Tokyo District Court
Plaintiff
艾礼富电子（深圳）有限公司、株式会社日本アレフ
Defendant
シャープ株式会社を含む被告2社（他の被告名はNot disclosed）
Claim amount / surcharge amount
艾礼富电子（深圳）有限公司に対し3,447万6,279円及び遅延損害金、株式会社日本アレフに対し2,333万4,494円及び遅延損害金
Amount of Impact on Business Performance
解決金50万円の支払い（会計上の計上区分はNot disclosed）
Impact on Earnings Forecast
本和解による当社連結業績への影響は軽微
Outlook
本和解による当社連結業績への影響は軽微です。
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Event name | Resolution of damages claim litigation through settlement |
| Date of occurrence | 2025年2月26日（和解成立日） |
| Subject Entity | シャープ株式会社（当社） |
| Target Locations / Products | 当社が製造した発光素子 |
| Cause | 原告らは、当社が製造した発光素子に不具合があると主張 |
| Amount of Impact on Business Performance | 解決金50万円の支払い（会計上の計上区分はNot disclosed） |
| Impact on Earnings Forecast | 本和解による当社連結業績への影響は軽微 |
| Type of litigation or proceeding | Settlement of a damages claim lawsuit |
| Court or authority | Tokyo District Court |
| Plaintiff | 艾礼富电子（深圳）有限公司、株式会社日本アレフ |
| Defendant | シャープ株式会社を含む被告2社（他の被告名はNot disclosed） |
| Date of filing / date of action | 提訴日：2022年3月24日、和解成立日：2025年2月26日 |
| Claim amount / surcharge amount | 艾礼富电子（深圳）有限公司に対し3,447万6,279円及び遅延損害金、株式会社日本アレフに対し2,333万4,494円及び遅延損害金 |
| Outlook | 本和解による当社連結業績への影響は軽微です。 |
Items this document does not state (11)
Date recognized / date notice receivedAccounting period in which recognizedAmount of receivables at risk of non-collection or delayed collectionSuspended operationsScheduled resumption dateInvestigation structureMeasures to prevent recurrenceDirectors' and officers' liabilityVoting rights ownership percentage before the changeVoting rights ownership percentage after the changePlanned follow-up disclosure
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.裁判所から和解の打診を受け、協議した結果、和解が成立したと説明している。
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.