Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual (24th) and Class Meeting of Common ShareholdersCancellation of the Incorporation-Type Company Split Plan
Approval of the absorption merger agreement
Reduction in the Amounts of Stated Capital and Capital Reserve and Disposal of Surplus
Partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
Election of 5 Directors
Class Meeting of Common Shareholders, Proposal No. 1: Cancellation of the incorporation-type company split plan
Class Meeting of Common Shareholders, Proposal No. 2: Approval of the merger agreement by absorption
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual (24th) and Class Meeting of Common Shareholders |
| Date and time | 24 June 2026 (start time: Not disclosed) |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal No. 1: Cancellation of the Incorporation-Type Company Split Plan, Proposal No. 2: Approval of the absorption merger agreement, Proposal No. 3: Reduction in the Amounts of Stated Capital and Capital Reserve and Disposal of Surplus, Proposal No. 4: Partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, Proposal No. 5: Election of 5 Directors, Class Meeting of Common Shareholders, Proposal No. 1: Cancellation of the incorporation-type company split plan, Class Meeting of Common Shareholders, Proposal No. 2: Approval of the merger agreement by absorption |
| Director nominee | 5, of whom new appointments: Not disclosed; outside directors: Not disclosed |
| Percentage voting in favor | Not disclosed → Not disclosed（Annual General Meeting of Shareholders Proposal No. 1 99.494% / Proposal No. 2 99.493% / Proposal No. 3 99.484% / Proposal No. 4 99.512% / Proposal No. 5 Scott Callon 98.115% / Proposal No. 5 Ueki Toshihiro (植木 俊博) 98.870% / Proposal No. 5 Koseki Tamane (小関 珠音) 98.891% / Proposal No. 5 Ito Shiho (伊藤 志保) 98.891% / Proposal No. 5 Kitahara Hiroaki (北原 洋明) 99.461% / Class Meeting of Common Shareholders Proposal No. 1 99.463% / Proposal No. 2 99.453%） |
Items this document does not state (1)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Company explained that, based on its tally of votes exercised in advance and votes for which approval or disapproval could be confirmed on the day of the meetings, the requirements for approval of each proposal had been met. Accordingly, it did not add votes for which approval or disapproval could not be confirmed.