Decision and Details
Post-event disclosure matters relating to the absorption-type merger
Because the merger was between a wholly owned parent company and its wholly owned subsidiary, it was determined appropriate not to deliver consideration. For statutory post-merger disclosure under the Companies Act and the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Companies Act.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Matter Covered | Post-event disclosure matters relating to the absorption-type merger |
| Decision Date | 1 July 2026 (date of execution of the absorption-type merger agreement) |
| Implementation Date | 1 October 2026 (effective date of the merger; completed) |
| Period Covered | From 1 October 2026 onward |
| Amount | Series 68 Unsecured Bonds: total issue amount ¥20 billion; Series 69 Unsecured Bonds: total issue amount ¥30 billion |
| Quantity / scale | Shares relating to notices of dissent: 2,000 shares; shareholders: 1 |
| Reason | Because the merger was between a wholly owned parent company and its wholly owned subsidiary, it was determined appropriate not to deliver consideration. For statutory post-merger disclosure under the Companies Act and the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Companies Act. |
| Governing Rule | Article 801, paragraph 3, item 1; Article 200 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Companies Act; Articles 789, 796, 797, 799 and 921 of the Companies Act |
| Related previous disclosures | Agreement on the Absorption-Type Merger dated 1 July 2026; matters disclosed in advance regarding the absorption-type merger dated 4 August 2026 |
| Future plans | The Company plans to apply for registration of the change under Article 921 of the Companies Act by 14 October 2026. |
Items this document does not state (2)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.Because the merger was between a wholly owned parent company and its wholly owned subsidiary, it was determined appropriate not to deliver consideration. To report the statutory post-merger disclosure matters.