Optoelectronics (6664) · FactThe scope of the write-down of deferred tax assets expanded to include the company and its US subsidiary
Net Loss for the Current Period Due to the Write-Down of Deferred Tax Assets at Overseas Subsidiaries
First written in FY2022. . Latest entry: FY2023.
2entries
2years
0from disclosures
How it moved
Same theme, other companies
One-Off Expense from Deferred Income Tax Expense Due to Reversal of Deferred Tax AssetsA theme 54 companies write about · 54 as a headwind · 0 as a tailwind
The whole theme swung hardest in 2019: 3 of 13 companies on the "Worse" side.
22 other companies' latest entry also says "Other".
Ridges = years it wrote progress, valleys = years it wrote worse. Most hopeful companies at the back. Drag to turn, scroll to zoom, right-drag to pan. On a phone, two fingers turn and pinch to zoom; one finger scrolls the page.
Showing 14 of the 54 companies compared. The sentences above are computed from all 54.Full recordFilings, disclosures and news, newest first
- FY2023The scope of the write-down of deferred tax assets expanded to include the company and its US subsidiaryAnnual report
「This resulted from the Group writing down deferred tax assets at the Company and its U.S. subsidiary, after taking into account the impact of the Group’s performance and other factors, and recording ¥264 million in income taxes and other adjustments.」
The scope of the write-down expanded from the overseas subsidiary in the previous fiscal year to the Company and its U.S. subsidiary, resulting in the recognition of ¥264 million in income taxes and other adjustments. - FY2022First statedAnnual report
「At an overseas subsidiary, the Group recognized a net loss for the period after writing down ¥176 million in deferred tax assets and recording ¥175 million in income taxes and other adjustments, following consideration of the subsidiary’s performance, surging raw material prices, litigation and other factors.」
The write-down of ¥176 million in deferred tax assets, after taking into account the overseas subsidiary’s performance, surging raw material prices, litigation and other factors, was identified separately for the first time as a factor behind the ¥47 million net loss for the period.