Kvk (6484) · RiskAchieved
Patent-Infringement Litigation and Dismissal of the Plaintiff's Claims
First written in FY2016. 1 of 4 entries say "Materialised", first in FY2016. Latest entry: FY2018.
4entries
3years
0from disclosures
How it moved
Same theme, other companies
Litigation Risk Associated with Intellectual Property Rights InfringementA theme 23 companies write about · 23 as a headwind · 0 as a tailwind
The whole theme swung hardest in 2020: 2 of 9 companies on the "Worse" side.
0 other companies' latest entry also says "Achieved".
Ridges = years it wrote progress, valleys = years it wrote worse. Most hopeful companies at the back. Drag to turn, scroll to zoom, right-drag to pan. On a phone, two fingers turn and pinch to zoom; one finger scrolls the page.
Showing 14 of the 23 companies compared. The sentences above are computed from all 23.Full recordFilings, disclosures and news, newest first
- FY2018AchievedAnnual report
「The parties agreed that the Company would pay ¥150 million in settlement, and the settlement was reached on 13 April 2018.」
The patent-infringement litigation, which had continued following the appeal, was settled on 13 April 2018. - FY2017RestatedAnnual report
「Subsequently, on 7 July 2016, the Plaintiff appealed to the Intellectual Property High Court.」
The Company reconfirms that the patent-infringement litigation continued following the Plaintiff's appeal even after the judgment dismissing the Plaintiff's claims. - FY2017-Q1Litigation Continued Following an AppealAnnual report
「Subsequently, on 7 July 2016, the Plaintiff appealed to the Intellectual Property High Court.」
After the judgment dismissing the Plaintiff's claims, the Plaintiff appealed on 7 July 2016, and the patent-infringement litigation continued. - FY2016MaterialisedAnnual report
「On 28 August 2014, the Company was sued for patent infringement by JFE Joint Corporation (the "Plaintiff"). On 23 June 2016, the Osaka District Court rendered a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff's claims.」
The Company states that patent-infringement litigation was in fact initiated and that, before the filing date, a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff's claims had been rendered.