Risk of Nuclear Power Plant Restart Suspensions and Delays
First written in FY2016-Q3. 11 of 24 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2026-H1.
0 other companies' latest entry also says "Mitigated".
- FY2026-H1MitigatedAnnual report
「Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings' Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant Unit 6 resumed operations in April 2026 for the first time in approximately 14 years, and activity surrounding nuclear power plants is becoming increasingly vigorous.」
It was reported that Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant Unit 6 resumed operations after approximately 14 years, mitigating part of the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants. At the same time, projects still in the planning stage, including efforts to restart Tomari Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3 in 2027, were also listed. - FY2025MitigatedAnnual report
「In addition, Tohoku Electric Power's Onagawa Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 resumed operations in October 2024 and Chugoku Electric Power's Shimane Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 resumed operations in December 2024. Efforts are also under way to restart Hokkaido Electric Power's Tomari Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3 in 2027.」
The restarts of the Onagawa and Shimane nuclear power plants and preparations to restart the Tomari Nuclear Power Plant were reported, indicating partial mitigation of the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants. However, uncertainty arising from regulatory requirements, court decisions and other factors remains. - FY2024MitigatedAnnual report
「Tohoku Electric Power's Onagawa Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 resumed operations in October 2024 for the first time in approximately 13 years, and further nuclear power plant restarts are scheduled,」
It was stated that the restart of Onagawa Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 after approximately 13 years mitigated part of the shutdown and delay risk. At the same time, the possibility of shutdowns caused by court decisions, regulatory requirements or accidents remained a risk. - FY2024-Q2RestatedAnnual report
「During the first six months of the fiscal year, there were no newly emerging business or other risks. In addition, there were no material changes to the business and other risks described in the annual securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
No new developments or significant changes were identified regarding the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants. - FY2024-Q1RestatedAnnual report
「During the first quarter of the fiscal year, there were no newly emerging business or other risks. In addition, there were no material changes to the business and other risks described in the annual securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
No new developments or significant changes were identified regarding the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants. - FY2023-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「There were no newly arising business or other risks during the nine-month period ended in the third quarter of the current fiscal year. In addition, there were no significant changes to the business or other risks described in the annual securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
No new developments or significant changes were identified regarding the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants. - FY2021MitigatedAnnual report
「Operations have resumed at 10 units across 6 nuclear power plants to date, but the situation remains highly uncertain, partly because of delays in SSARF construction,」
The number of restarted units increased, mitigating part of the shutdown and delay risk. However, the risk was not considered to have been eliminated because of delays in SSARF construction and other factors. - FY2021-Q3MitigatedAnnual report
「There were also positive developments, including the restart of Kansai Electric Power's Mihama Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3, which had been in operation for more than 40 years.」
The restart of Mihama Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3, which had been in operation for more than 40 years, was achieved, mitigating part of the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants. - FY2020MaterialisedAnnual report
「With successive shutdowns caused by delays in SSARF construction and the impact of court proceedings, the situation is once again approaching that immediately after the 2011 nuclear accident, and the outlook remains highly uncertain.」
Successive nuclear power plant shutdowns caused by delays in SSARF construction and the impact of court proceedings were reported to have actually occurred, bringing the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants to the fore. - FY2020-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「There were no newly arising business or other risks during the nine-month period ended in the third quarter of the current fiscal year. In addition, there were no significant changes to the business or other risks described in the annual securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
No new developments or significant changes were identified regarding the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants. - FY2020-Q2RestatedAnnual report
「No new business or other risks arose during the 2nd quarter cumulative period. There were also no material changes to the business and other risks described in the securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
No new developments or significant changes were identified regarding the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants. - FY2020-Q1RestatedAnnual report
「During the first quarter of the fiscal year, there were no newly emerging business or other risks. In addition, there were no material changes to the business and other risks described in the annual securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
No new developments or significant changes were identified regarding the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants. - FY2019WorsenedAnnual report
「In addition, it became clear this spring that even nuclear power plants that had resumed operations could be forced to suspend operations for a certain period because of delays in constructing specified severe accident response facilities (SSARFs), which are being built as countermeasures against terrorism at nuclear power plants. We are currently evaluating the impact on the future performance of our Group.」
It was indicated that even nuclear power plants that had resumed operations could be shut down for a certain period because of delays in constructing SSARFs, expanding the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants through a new factor. However, this did not state that an actual shutdown had occurred. - FY2019-Q2RestatedAnnual report
「No new business or other risks arose during the 2nd quarter cumulative period. There were also no material changes to the business and other risks described in the securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
No new developments or significant changes were identified regarding the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants. - FY2019-Q1RestatedAnnual report
「During the first quarter of the fiscal year, there were no newly emerging business or other risks. In addition, there were no material changes to the business and other risks described in the annual securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
No new developments or significant changes were identified regarding the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants. - FY2018MitigatedAnnual report
「Shikoku Electric Power's Ikata Nuclear Power Plant, which had been shut down by a court order, also resumed operations in October this year, and we believe demand related to nuclear power plants will gradually recover going forward.」
The Ikata Nuclear Power Plant, which had been shut down by a court order, resumed operations, eliminating part of the existing shutdown risk. However, the risk was not described as having disappeared, as the restart of Hokkaido Electric Power's Tomari Nuclear Power Plant remains pending and the outlook for restarting BWRs is uncertain. - FY2018-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「However, in December 2017, a court ordered the suspension of operations at Shikoku Electric Power's Ikata Nuclear Power Plant, among other developments, and the situation remains highly uncertain,」
The court-ordered suspension of operations at the Ikata Nuclear Power Plant was reconfirmed as a risk that could prevent the plant's restart and recovery in the operating environment. - FY2018-Q2RestatedAnnual report
「However, in December 2017, a court ordered the suspension of operations at Shikoku Electric Power's Ikata Nuclear Power Plant, among other developments, and the situation remains highly uncertain,」
The court-ordered suspension of operations at the Ikata Nuclear Power Plant was reconfirmed as a risk that could prevent the plant's restart and recovery in the operating environment. - FY2018-Q1WorsenedAnnual report
「However, in December 2017, a court ordered the suspension of operations at Shikoku Electric Power's Ikata Nuclear Power Plant, among other developments, and the situation remains highly uncertain.」
Even after the suspension of operations at the Takahama Nuclear Power Plant was lifted, a new court-ordered suspension of operations occurred at the Ikata Nuclear Power Plant, increasing the risk of suspension or delays in restarting nuclear power plants. - FY2017RestatedAnnual report
「In March this year, the Osaka High Court revoked the provisional order suspending operations at Kansai Electric Power's Takahama Nuclear Power Plant. Unit 4 resumed operations in May, followed by Unit 3 in June.」
The lifting of the court-ordered suspension of operations at the Takahama Nuclear Power Plant and the resumption of operations were reconfirmed. - FY2017-Q3MitigatedAnnual report
「Following the Osaka High Court's rescission in March of the provisional disposition barring the operation of Kansai Electric Power's Takahama Nuclear Power Station, Unit 4 of the station resumed operations in May and Unit 3 in June」
The court-ordered suspension of operations at the Takahama Nuclear Power Plant was lifted, and Units 4 and 3 resumed operations. - FY2017-Q2MitigatedAnnual report
「The Osaka High Court's rescission in March of the provisional disposition barring the operation of Kansai Electric Power's Takahama Nuclear Power Station made it likely that the station would resume operations before this summer.」
The judicially imposed suspension of operations at Takahama Nuclear Power Station was lifted, creating conditions in which a restart could be expected. - FY2016WorsenedAnnual report
「In particular, we cannot help but feel a strong sense of crisis when judicial decisions prevent nuclear power plants from restarting or require them to suspend operations.」
The inability to restart or the suspension of operations due to judicial decisions was identified as a risk causing a strong sense of management concern. - FY2016-Q3First statedAnnual report
「The restart of Kansai Electric Power's Takahama Nuclear Power Station in January this year was good news following the restart of Kyushu Electric Power's Sendai Nuclear Power Station last year. However, a provisional disposition barring the restart was issued in March, resulting in the station being shut down again.」
It stated that there had been a case in which operations were suspended under a provisional disposition even after a restart had been achieved.