Pressure on Asian Profit from Costs Associated with Relocating a New Plant
First written in FY2019-Q1. 3 of 4 entries say "Materialised", first in FY2019-Q2. Latest entry: FY2019.
Tpr moved to the "Worse" side of this theme in 2018.
0 other companies' latest entry also says "Materialised".
- FY2019MaterialisedAnnual report
「Segment profit was ¥844.3 million, down ¥3,171 million from the same period of the previous year due to lower sales, higher raw-material prices, costs associated with relocating a new plant and other factors.」
Costs associated with relocating a new plant are cited as a factor reducing full-year profit in Asia by ¥3,171 million year on year. - FY2019-Q3MaterialisedAnnual report
「Segment profit was ¥673.2 million, down ¥2,251 million from the same period of the previous year due to lower sales, higher raw-material prices, costs associated with relocating a new plant and other factors.」
Costs associated with relocating a new plant are actually being incurred as a factor reducing cumulative segment profit in Asia by ¥2,251 million year on year. - FY2019-Q2MaterialisedAnnual report
「Segment profit was ¥488.5 million, down ¥1,290 million from the same period of the previous year due to lower sales, higher raw-material prices, costs associated with relocating a new plant and other factors.」
Costs associated with relocating a new plant are actually being incurred as a factor behind lower profit in Asia. quantified is true, and materialized is true. - FY2019-Q1First statedAnnual report
「Segment income was ¥2,630 million, down ¥700 million year on year, owing to lower sales, higher raw-material costs and expenses associated with relocating to a new plant.」
Expenses associated with relocating to a new plant actually reduced Asian segment income, together with lower sales and higher raw-material costs.