Worth reading
58In focus
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.Direction
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
2
Reduction in the number of directors (people)Wording
Conditional
How definitive the wording is.Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual, 93rd2026
Jun 23
Date and time(Tuesday), 10:00 a.m. (registration opens at 9:00 a.m.)22 days from this disclosure to the meeting
Matters for resolution2 items
Election of 8 directors
Election of 2 Audit & Supervisory Board members
Shareholder Proposal
No
A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.Director nominee
8Nominees
2New
4Outside
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual, 93rd |
| Date and time | 23 June 2026 (Tuesday), 10:00 a.m. (registration opens at 9:00 a.m.) |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal No. 1: Election of 8 directors, Proposal No. 2: Election of 2 Audit & Supervisory Board members |
| Shareholder Proposal | No |
| Director nominee | 8 people, including 2 new candidates and 4 outside directors |
Items this document does not state (1)
Percentage voting in favor
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.To strengthen the Board of Directors’ oversight of management by increasing the proportion of outside directors.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.