Risk of Recall Costs and Brand Damage from Serious Quality Issues
First written in FY2016. 3 of 4 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2022.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2025: 9 of 27 companies on the "Worse" side.
47 other companies' latest entry also says "Restated".
- FY2022RestatedAnnual report
「If a serious quality issue were to arise, it could affect the performance of the Group through recall costs and a deterioration in its brand image.」
The company reiterates the risk of recall costs and brand deterioration due to serious quality issues, along with management by the PL Committee and Quality Assurance Department. - FY2018RestatedAnnual report
「If a serious quality issue were to arise, it could affect the performance of the Group through recall costs and a deterioration in its brand image.」
The company reiterates the risk of recall costs and brand deterioration due to serious quality issues, along with the responses by the PL Committee and Quality Assurance Department. - FY2017RestatedAnnual report
「If a serious quality issue were to arise, it could affect the performance of the Group through recall costs and a deterioration in its brand image.」
The company reiterates the risk of recall costs and brand deterioration due to serious quality issues, along with the responses by the PL Committee and Quality Assurance Department. - FY2016First statedAnnual report
「If a serious quality issue were to arise, it could affect the performance of the Group through recall costs and a deterioration in its brand image.」
The company identifies monthly safety reviews by the PL Committee and quality audits and monitoring by the Quality Assurance Department as countermeasures.