Maruyama Mfg.Co. (6316) · RiskRestated
Sanctions and Reputational Damage Due to Legal or Compliance Violations
First written in FY2020. 1 of 2 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2021.
2entries
2years
0from disclosures
How it moved
Same theme, other companies
Risk of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Laws, Permits and RegulationsA theme 43 companies write about · 43 as a headwind · 0 as a tailwind
The whole theme swung hardest in 2026: 4 of 13 companies on the "Worse" side.
21 other companies' latest entry also says "Restated".
Ridges = years it wrote progress, valleys = years it wrote worse. Most hopeful companies at the back. Drag to turn, scroll to zoom, right-drag to pan. On a phone, two fingers turn and pinch to zoom; one finger scrolls the page.
Showing 14 of the 43 companies compared. The sentences above are computed from all 43.Full recordFilings, disclosures and news, newest first
- FY2021RestatedAnnual report
「The Group has established the Maruyama Group Compliance Manual as its code of corporate conduct, developed a compliance framework and worked to strengthen compliance with laws and regulations through training sessions and other measures.」
The Group continues to disclose its efforts to comply with laws and regulations through its compliance manual, compliance framework and training sessions, as well as the risks of sanctions and reputational damage in the event of a violation. - FY2020First statedAnnual report
「However, if an act violating laws, regulations or compliance requirements were to occur, regulatory sanctions, restrictions on business activities, litigation or reputational damage could affect the performance and financial condition of the Group.」
In addition to existing compliance training and whistleblowing measures, the disclosure explicitly identifies the impact of regulatory sanctions, business restrictions, litigation and reputational damage in the event of a violation as risks.