Revised forecast
Fiscal year ending February 2026 · Full yearPrevious forecast published 19 February 2026The bar length represents the relative magnitude of change, based on the item that changed the most in this document. The percentage change shown by the dotted line is calculated from the two reported figures because the company did not provide the rate.
Revenue, operating profit, and ordinary profit fell below the previous forecast because progress on large-scale projects accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method was delayed relative to the assumptions underlying the previous forecast, among other factors.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Net Sales | ¥21,400 million → ¥21,170 million（-1.1%） |
| Operating profit | ¥240 million → ¥162 million（-32.2%） |
| Ordinary income | ¥410 million → ¥350 million（-14.5%） |
| Profit attributable to owners of the parent | ¥1,980 million → ¥1,972 million（-0.4%） |
| Net income per share | 74.79 yen → 74.51 yen |
| Fiscal Period Covered | Fiscal year ending February 2026 |
| Period Covered | Full year |
| Publication date of previous forecast | 19 February 2026 |
| Previous-period results | Revenue: ¥19,950 million; operating loss: ¥300 million; ordinary loss: ¥142 million; net loss attributable to owners of the parent: ¥778 million; net loss per share: ¥29.41 (fiscal year ended February 2025) |
| Reason for the revision | Revenue, operating profit, and ordinary profit fell below the previous forecast because progress on large-scale projects accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method was delayed relative to the assumptions underlying the previous forecast, among other factors. |
| Consolidated / non-consolidated | Consolidated |
Items this document does not state (2)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.Revenue, operating profit, and ordinary profit fell below the previous forecast because progress on large-scale projects accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method was delayed relative to the assumptions underlying the previous forecast, among other factors.