Rakuten Bank (5838) · RiskRestated
Risk of administrative measures if capital adequacy ratio falls below 4%
First written in FY2025. 1 of 2 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2026.
2entries
2years
0from disclosures
How it moved
Same theme, other companies
Maintenance of a Bank's Capital Adequacy Ratio under Domestic StandardsA theme 45 companies write about · 38 as a headwind · 13 as a tailwind
The whole theme swung hardest in 2017: 9 of 38 companies on the "Worse" side.
1 other company's latest entry also says "Restated".
Ridges = years it wrote progress, valleys = years it wrote worse. Most hopeful companies at the back. Drag to turn, scroll to zoom, right-drag to pan. On a phone, two fingers turn and pinch to zoom; one finger scrolls the page.
Showing 14 of the 45 companies compared. The sentences above are computed from all 45.Full recordFilings, disclosures and news, newest first
- FY2026RestatedAnnual report
「As a bank subject to domestic standards, the bank is required to maintain a capital adequacy ratio of 4% or higher.」
The bank continues to disclose the possibility of administrative measures if its capital adequacy ratio falls below 4% as a risk. - FY2025First statedAnnual report
「As a bank subject to domestic standards, the bank is required to maintain a capital adequacy ratio of 4% or higher.」
The bank explicitly identifies as a risk the possibility of administrative measures by the Financial Services Agency, including a full or partial suspension of operations, if its capital adequacy ratio falls below 4%.