Worth reading
70In focus
Scored from 1 of 5 sectionsDirection
Improvement
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
3
At least peopleWording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Governance structure
Committee1
指名報酬委員会：社外役員が過半数（割合の具体的数値は非開示）
Changes this time
2025年4月16日付で、取締役会の諮問機関として任意の指名報酬委員会を設置。3名以上の役員で構成し、過半数を社外役員とする。
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Committee | 指名報酬委員会：社外役員が過半数（割合の具体的数値はNot disclosed） |
| Changes this time | 2025年4月16日付で、取締役会の諮問機関として任意の指名報酬委員会を設置。3名以上の役員で構成し、過半数を社外役員とする。 |
Items this document does not state (6)
Corporate Governance StructureNumber of directorsNumber of independent officersPolicy on cross-shareholdingsTakeover defensesControlling shareholder
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.役員の指名・報酬に関する取締役会の機能の独立性・透明性・客観性を強化し、説明責任の明確化とコーポレート・ガバナンスの充実を図るため。
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.