Shinagawa Refra (5351) · RiskRestated
Decline in competitiveness due to delays in technology development
First written in FY2016. 1 of 2 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2018.
2entries
3years
0from disclosures
How it moved
Same theme, other companies
Product Obsolescence Due to Intensified Competition and Delays in Adapting to TechnologyA theme 124 companies write about · 127 as a headwind · 0 as a tailwind
The whole theme swung hardest in 2026: 28 of 57 companies on the "Worse" side.
65 other companies' latest entry also says "Restated".
Ridges = years it wrote progress, valleys = years it wrote worse. Most hopeful companies at the back. Drag to turn, scroll to zoom, right-drag to pan. On a phone, two fingers turn and pinch to zoom; one finger scrolls the page.
Showing 14 of the 124 companies compared. The sentences above are computed from all 124.Full recordFilings, disclosures and news, newest first
- FY2018RestatedAnnual report
「Our group's technological capabilities currently have sufficient competitiveness compared with those of competing companies, but delays in technological development may cause us to lose competitiveness and adversely affect the group's financial performance and financial condition.」
While indicating that the group's technological capabilities are currently viewed favorably, it reiterates the risk of declining competitiveness due to delays in technological development. - FY2016First statedAnnual report
「Delays in technological development may cause us to lose competitiveness and adversely affect the group's financial performance and financial condition.」
Amid competition with other companies, it identifies delays in technological development as a factor that could lead to a loss of competitiveness.