Operational Disruptions Caused by Disasters at Production Sites and Suppliers
First written in FY2016. 3 of 8 entries say "Materialised", first in FY2019-Q2. Latest entry: FY2024.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2018: 32 of 132 companies on the "Worse" side.
- FY2024RestatedAnnual report
「The Group conducts regular disaster-prevention inspections and equipment maintenance at all production facilities to prevent interruptions to production activities. However, if a major earthquake or other disaster occurs at Iwakura, Tokyo, Himeji, Fukusaki or another of the Group's production sites, causing significant damage to production facilities or a production shutdown, this could affect the Group's financial results.」
While conducting regular disaster-prevention inspections and equipment maintenance, the Group has reconfirmed the risk of production disruptions caused by disasters at production sites and suppliers. - FY2020WorsenedAnnual report
「Loss due to disaster ¥332 million」
A loss of ¥332 million due to a disaster was recorded, up from ¥177 million in the previous fiscal year. The impact of disaster risk continues to materialise in the results. - FY2019MaterialisedAnnual report
「Loss due to disaster ¥177 million」
A loss of ¥177 million due to a disaster was recorded in the consolidated income statement for the current consolidated fiscal year, and the impact associated with disaster risks at production sites and elsewhere materialised in the results. - FY2019-Q3MaterialisedAnnual report
「Loss due to disaster ¥106 million」
A loss of ¥106 million due to a disaster was recorded in the quarterly consolidated income statement, and the impact associated with disaster risks at production sites and elsewhere materialised in the results. - FY2019-Q2MaterialisedAnnual report
「Losses from disasters 56」
A loss of ¥56 million due to a disaster was recorded in the quarterly consolidated income statement, and the impact associated with disaster risks at production sites and elsewhere materialised in the results. - FY2018RestatedAnnual report
「The Group conducts regular disaster-prevention inspections and equipment maintenance at all production facilities to prevent interruptions to production activities. However, if a major earthquake or other disaster occurs at Iwakura, Tokyo, Himeji, Fukusaki or another of the Group's production sites, causing significant damage to production facilities or a production shutdown, this could affect the Group's financial results.」
While conducting regular inspections and equipment maintenance, the Group has reconfirmed the risk of production disruptions caused by disasters at production sites and suppliers. - FY2017Preventive controls disclosedAnnual report
「The Group conducts regular disaster-prevention inspections and equipment maintenance at all production facilities to prevent interruptions to production activities. However, if a major earthquake or other disaster occurs at Iwakura, Tokyo, Himeji, Fukusaki or another of the Group's production sites, causing significant damage to production facilities or a production shutdown, this could affect the Group's financial results.」
While retaining the disaster risk, the Group discloses preventive measures consisting of regular disaster-prevention inspections and equipment maintenance. - FY2016First statedAnnual report
「If a major earthquake or other disaster occurs at Iwakura, Tokyo, Himeji, Fukusaki or another of the Group's production sites, causing significant damage to production facilities or a production shutdown, this could affect the Group's financial results.」
The Group identifies not only damage to its own sites but also the inability to procure materials due to disasters affecting suppliers as a factor that could affect operations.