Decision and Details
Tokyo District CourtIssuance of a provisional disposition order prohibiting the disposition of subsidiary shares and other assets held by the Company
To prevent the relevant shares from being disposed of to third parties. The Company believes that each revolving pledge agreement is invalid and that it remains the shareholder of each class of relevant shares.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Matter Covered | Issuance of a provisional disposition order prohibiting the disposition of subsidiary shares and other assets held by the Company |
| Decision-Making Body | Tokyo District Court |
| Decision Date | 13 July 2026 (date of issuance of the provisional disposition order) |
| Implementation Date | 13 July 2026 (order issued and effective) |
| Quantity / scale | 13,077 common shares of 株式会社日本橋本町菓子処, 4,032 common shares of 明日香食品株式会社, 9,540 common shares of 昭和ゴム株式会社, 540 common shares of 株式会社ルーセント, and 10,826,100 common shares of 株式会社ウェッジホールディングス |
| Reason | To prevent the relevant shares from being disposed of to third parties. The Company believes that each revolving pledge agreement is invalid and that it remains the shareholder of each class of relevant shares. |
| Related previous disclosures | Notice regarding the provision of subsidiary shares as collateral for borrowings from a consolidated subsidiary, dated 25 June 2026; and Notice regarding receipt of a notice of enforcement of security interests from a consolidated subsidiary and the change in status of a consolidated subsidiary (change from consolidated subsidiary to equity-method affiliate), dated 26 June 2026 |
| Future plans | The Company will take the necessary legal measures, including filing an action on the merits. If any matter requiring disclosure arises, the Company will promptly disclose it. |
Items this document does not state (4)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Company explains that it filed the petition to prevent disposition of the relevant shares to third parties because it believes that the revolving pledge agreements executed by persons without representative authority are invalid and that the Company remains the shareholder of the relevant shares.